Why is f(x,y) not differentiable at (0,0)?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiability of the function f(x,y) = sqrt(abs(xy)) at the point (0,0). Participants are exploring the conditions under which differentiability can be assessed, particularly focusing on the behavior of the function near this point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to show that the function is not differentiable by considering directional derivatives and the gradient, expressing confusion about handling the absolute value in the function. Other participants suggest checking for continuity and taking limits to analyze differentiability, while questioning which specific limits to consider.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various approaches being proposed, including the use of limits and the definition of a derivative for multivariable functions. Some participants are exploring the implications of different paths toward (0,0) and the resulting limits, indicating a productive exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the gradient and the behavior of the function under different conditions, as well as a reference to continuity at the origin, which may influence the understanding of differentiability.

wakko101
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hello,

My question is as follows: Show that the function f(x,y) = sqrt(abs(xy)) is not differentiable at (0,0).

I was going to go with trying to show that the directional derivatives don't all exist here, but that would require finding the gradient, and I always get confused when trying to take the derivative of an absolute value. Essentially, this means that for xy larger than 0, f = sqrt(xy) and for xy smaller than 0, f = sqrt(-xy). But, of course, you can't have the square root of a negative number, so I'm confused...what should I do?

Thanks,
W.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show that's it's not continuous?
 
Try taking limits and show that the limit doesn't exist at (0,0).
 
but which limits? If I want to use the definition of a derivative for multi variables, then I still need the gradient, don't I?
 
Use the limit definition of Df(x,y). In this case, if f were differentiable at 0, then Df(0,0) would be the zero map. On the other hand, by approaching zero along the 45 degree line in the first quadrant one would then have the limit to be 0 in spite of the fact that the limit is clearly 1. You'll have to try it to see what I mean.
 
Since this problem is old now, I will give out my full solution now:

http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/5482/mysolutiontf9.jpg

JFonseka said:
Show that's it's not continuous?
Actually, f(x,y) is continuous at 0:

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/1144/continuityproofqf0.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K