Why is i^2 equal to negative one and not positive one?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter srfriggen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Positive
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical properties of the imaginary unit, i, particularly why i squared equals -1 rather than +1. Participants explore the implications of this definition within the context of complex numbers and the rules governing square roots.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the logic behind the assertion that i squared equals -1, suggesting that it could be interpreted as +1 based on their calculations.
  • Another participant clarifies that the properties of square roots in complex numbers differ from those in real numbers, indicating that the square root is not unique in the complex domain.
  • A further contribution highlights that the property of radicals used in the initial argument is only valid when both numbers involved are nonnegative.
  • One participant emphasizes the definition of i as the imaginary unit, which is specifically defined to satisfy i squared equals -1, and notes its usefulness in polynomial factorization and representing rotations in the complex plane.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of square root properties in complex numbers, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain regarding the initial logic presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion touches on the limitations of applying real number properties to complex numbers, particularly concerning the uniqueness of square roots and the conditions under which certain mathematical laws hold.

srfriggen
Messages
304
Reaction score
7
Someone please tell me what is wrong with this logic:

i = √-1

i2= √-1√-1 = √(-1)(-1) = √+1 = 1

But also i2 = (√-1)1/2= -1
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: p-k98
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The square root is not unique any more in the complex numbers. The laws that work for positive real numbers don't work for complex numbers in general.
 
... and the property of radicals that you used -- ##\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b} = \sqrt{ab}## -- is applicable only if both a and b are nonnegative.
 
Thank you all for the response, much appreciated!
 
The symbol, i, was defined as the imaginary number which, when squared, gives -1. That definition should not be violated. It worked out very well with several other things. It allows every polynomial to be factored completely. It provides a good way to represent rotations in the two-dimensional complex plane with multiplication by complex numbers.
 
micromass said:
How does it come you know all the exotic corners out there? I'm flabbergasted every single time.
But that's not what I wanted to say. I like to take the chance to thank you for your Insight on the subject. I've linked it now for the third or forth time (hoping it will be read). Very useful.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K