I Why is initial current zero in an RL circuit with an emf?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Rios
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current
AI Thread Summary
In an RL circuit with an emf, the initial current is zero due to the inductor's property of resisting changes in current, while in an RC circuit, the current also starts from zero but quickly rises to a maximum value before decaying exponentially. The time it takes for the current to increase in an RC circuit is very small, influenced by the circuit's self-inductance and dimensions. Most textbooks overlook this brief phase because it is practically negligible. The discussion highlights the mechanical analogy between electrical components, comparing capacitors to springs and inductors to masses, emphasizing that even a massless spring cannot change length instantly. Overall, the initial current behavior in these circuits is fundamentally linked to their inductive and capacitive properties.
Fernando Rios
Messages
96
Reaction score
10
Why is initial current zero in an RL ciruit with an emf, but it is not in a charging RC circuit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It starts from zero in an RC circuit as well, but in a very small time ##\Delta t## (this time depends on the self inductance of the circuit which is small, and on the dimensions of the circuit/speed of light-practically this time ##\Delta t## is zero, theoretically is not zero) it climbs up to a value ##\frac{E}{R}## and then it starts exponential decay according to what is well known for an RC circuit. Most books omit this phase of the time ##\Delta t## because it is very small, practically zero as I said.
 
Delta2 said:
It starts from zero in an RC circuit as well, but in a very small time ##\Delta t## (this time depends on the self inductance of the circuit which is small, and on the dimensions of the circuit/speed of light-practically this time ##\Delta t## is zero, theoretically is not zero) it climbs up to a value ##\frac{E}{R}## and then it starts exponential decay according to what is well known for an RC circuit. Most books omit this phase of the time ##\Delta t## because it is very small, practically zero as I said.
Thanks for your answer.
 
In case you are interested for an explanation that uses more math take a look at the following wikipedia link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RLC_circuit#Series_circuit

Any RC circuit is actually an RLC circuit where L is the self inductance of the RC circuit (there is always self inductance to a circuit) which is small though.

So the damping factor ##\zeta=\frac{R}{2}\sqrt\frac{C}{L}## becomes large (because L is small and in the denominator) so it usually is ##\zeta>>1## for a typical RC circuit (which is actually an RLC circuit as i said before). So the circuit response is the overdamped response, that is exponential decay without going into oscillations.

Make sure to check the diagram with the different curves of current ##I(t)## for different values of ##\zeta## in that section of wikipedia link. Notice how all curves start from ##I(0)=0## and how current rises fast to a maximum value before starting the exponential decay.
 
You might like to think about a mechanical analogy. For instance, a spring (with zero mass) is like a capacitor; if we apply a force, it changes length instantly and stores the supplied energy as elastic PE. On the other hand, a mass is like an inductor; when we apply a force, it accelerate slowly (F=MA) and stores the applied energy as kinetic energy.
The mechanical laws are an analogue of the electrical ones. For instance, for an inductor Energy =LI^2/2 whereas for a mass Energy=Mv^2/2.
 
tech99 said:
You might like to think about a mechanical analogy. For instance, a spring (with zero mass) is like a capacitor; if we apply a force, it changes length instantly and stores the supplied energy as elastic PE. On the other hand, a mass is like an inductor; when we apply a force, it accelerate slowly (F=MA) and stores the applied energy as kinetic energy.
The mechanical laws are an analogue of the electrical ones. For instance, for an inductor Energy =LI^2/2 whereas for a mass Energy=Mv^2/2.
What you saying is almost correct, It is just that even if we attach no mass to a spring, the mass of the spring itself will prevent it of changing length instantly. However if we also assume that the spring is massless, then there is no way to prevent the mini apparent paradox that the spring will change length instantly.

In the RC circuit case if we assume that the circuit has no self inductance and also has zero dimensions (lumped model) then there is nothing from preventing the mini paradox that the current will have initial value E/R at time t=0.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top