Why Is Measuring Jupiter's Mass Using Its Four Largest Moons More Accurate?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the accuracy of measuring Jupiter's mass using its four largest moons—Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto—compared to all 16 moons. The user seeks clarification on the units of slope and y-intercept derived from an Excel graph, as well as how to calculate the correlation coefficient, 95% ranges, and confidence intervals using Excel functions like LINEST. The conclusion drawn is that the gravitational influence of the four largest moons provides a more stable and reliable measurement of Jupiter's mass due to their significant mass relative to the smaller moons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational dynamics and celestial mechanics
  • Proficiency in Microsoft Excel, particularly with functions like LINEST
  • Familiarity with linear regression concepts and statistical analysis
  • Basic knowledge of astronomical measurements and units
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the gravitational effects of celestial bodies on each other
  • Learn how to use the LINEST function in Excel for linear regression analysis
  • Study the principles of confidence intervals and correlation coefficients
  • Explore the significance of the four largest moons of Jupiter in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, data analysts, and anyone interested in celestial mechanics and statistical analysis in Excel.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I've attached the lab sheets for the lab I am currently working on, and I am wondering if someone could help me with it.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am having difficulty with part two, steps 5-8. I have the slope from my excel graph 0.6458, what units would this be in? I have the y-intercept, 12.347, again, what units would this be in? Supposedly its the mass of Jupiter. I don't know how to find the correlation coefficient, nor the 95% ranges, nor the confidence interval. How do I find these things in Excel?

I'm sorry if this isn't typed us so neatly, it's just that I have to hand this in today; so, I'm a bit frantic. I would certainly appreciate your help, though.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, I forgot to mention: I tried to upload the excel sheet, thinking it might make things more clear, but it wouldn't work. The file type is .xlsx, is there some way to change the file type, so that it may upload?
 
You'll have to save your Excel sheet as a different file type (usually a previous version of Excel)
 
All right, I was successful in uploading.
 
Usually the argument and result of a function are unitless, but the logarithm doesn't follow this rule. I wouldn't worry too much about the units.

To find the other stats, look at the LINEST function in Excel. For the confidence intervals, look into http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_linear_regression, particularly the numerical example at the bottom. I don't know offhand if Excel can calculate those for you.
 
I figured it all out. Thanks, Vela However, I have one more question: why is it more accurate to measure the mass of Jupiter in terms of the four largest moons, than to measure the mass of Jupiter in terms of all 16 moons? Does it have something to do with the gravitational pull of those large moons on the smaller ones? If why, would someone care to help me understand this? I can see mathematically that it is true, I just want to have some physical intuition as to why it's true.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K