Why Is My Calculated Torque Different from the Textbook's Answer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigsaucy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational torque of a uniform rod, specifically a 2.0 kg rod measuring 100 cm, with a pivot point located 25 cm from one end. The original poster expresses confusion over their calculated torque of 14.7 N·m compared to the textbook's answer of -4.9 N·m.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to divide the rod into separate masses to calculate the sum of their torques. Some question the feasibility of separating the masses, while others suggest using the center of mass for a more straightforward calculation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to approach the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the center of mass, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct method or interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the assumptions regarding the distribution of mass in the rod and how it affects torque calculations. There is also uncertainty about the pivot point's location and its impact on the torque value.

bigsaucy
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I've been wrestling with this question for awhile, please help!

There is a 2.0kg, uniform, horizontal rod measuring a total of 100cm. Toward the left end of the rod there is a point 25cm from the left end and 75cm from the right end. The question is to find the gravitation torque about the point.

I used the formula T = rF and got 14.7 N . m

the book says the answer is -4.9 N . m

im so confused, please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You need to divide the rod into separate masses and calculate the sum of their torques.
 


hello

i considered separating the masses but i didnt know of any feasible means of doing so
 


bigsaucy said:
hello

i considered separating the masses but i didnt know of any feasible means of doing so

You mean you can't determine 1/4 and 3/4 of 2.0kg?

A more expedient route to the torque when the rod is of uniform density is to simply use the distance of the center of mass of the rod (as a whole) from the point about which the torque is to be found.
 


i'm so terribly confused =[
 


Draw a diagram of the rod. Pencil in the rod's center of mass. Pencil in the location of the pivot point (point about which you are trying to find the torque due to gravity). What's the distance between the two points?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K