Why Is My Calculation of a Regular Polygon's Area Incorrect?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter disregardthat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Polygon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the calculation of the area of a regular polygon given the length of a side "a". Participants explore different approaches and formulas, examining the use of trigonometric identities and the application of the cosine rule in their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a formula for the area of a regular polygon as A_n = \frac{n}{4} a^2 \tan{\frac{180}{n}}, but expresses confusion over its correctness.
  • Another participant challenges the use of the cosine rule in the initial calculation, suggesting that the correct relationship involves the sine function instead.
  • A different participant suggests using the relationship a/2 = r \sin(180/n) to express r in terms of a, leading to an alternative area calculation.
  • Some participants note that trigonometric identities may not be necessary for arriving at a correct answer, although they acknowledge that using them could yield a different form of the answer.
  • There is a mention of the equivalence of different expressions for the area, indicating that while they may differ in form, they represent the same quantity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to calculating the area of the polygon, with multiple competing views and methods presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the necessity of trigonometric identities in their calculations, and there are unresolved issues regarding the application of the cosine rule and the sine function in the context of the problem.

disregardthat
Science Advisor
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
34
Hi, I am to find a formula for the area of a regular polygon with a side "a".

I just keep getting the wrong answer: this is how i did it:

if we draw a circle in a coordinate system, with radius "r". The diameter lyes on the x-axis. I draw an angle from the center. This angle is then 360/n where n is the amount of sides the polygon can have.

The two other angles in the triangle we get with two sides "r" and one side "a" is 180/n.

Ok, to find the side r expressed with a:

r^2 = r^2 + a^2 2ra \cos{\frac{180}{n}}

a = 2r \cos{\frac{180}{n}}

r = \frac{a}{2 \cos{\frac{180}{n}}}

The area of this triangle is:

A = \frac{1}{2} \sin{\frac{180}{n}} ar = \frac{1}{2} \sin{\frac{180}{n}} \frac{a}{2 \cos{\frac{180}{n}}} a = \frac{1}{4} \tan{\frac{180}{n}} a^2

The area of the whole polygon will then be the area of the triangles in the circle. I multiply with the number I divided 360 with, "n".

So: A_n =\frac{n}{4} a^2 \tan{\frac{180}{n}}

But this is wrong! Why is it wrong?

The correct answer is:
A_n =\frac{na^2}{4 \tan{\frac{180}{n}}}
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
r^2 = r^2 + a^2 - 2ra \cos{\frac{180}{n}}

This is wrong. The angle is 90 - 180/n, hence giving r^2 = r^2 + a^2 - 2ra \sin{\frac{180}{n}}
 
Last edited:
Jarle said:
Ok, to find the side r expressed with a:

r^2 = r^2 + a^2 2ra \cos{\frac{180}{n}}

I've got no idea where that line came from but it looks wrong (edit: ok I now see it was supposed to be the cosine rule). You should have just used :

a/2 = r \sin(180/n)

Which gives : r = \frac{a}{2 \sin(180/n)}

Now just substitute that into :

A = n ( \frac{1}{2} r^2 \sin(360/n) )

PS. Remember to use the trig identity : \sin(2x) = 2 \sin(x) \cos(x) if you want to get your answer in exactly the same form as the one given.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it was the cosine rule I meant.

Hmm, that was weird. We are not supposed to use trigonometric identities. Or at least the book doesn't mention any of it.
 
Well, uart expression is equivalent to A = n r^2 \sin(180/n)\cos(180/n)
 
Last edited:
Hmm, that was weird. We are not supposed to use trigonometric identities.


You can get a perfectly good (correct) answer without even using that last trig idenity, it just won't be in the exact same form as the one given. It will be 100% equivalent but just not an identical form.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K