Why is my plasma globe causing a geiger counter to go crazy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the unexpected detection of radiation by a Geiger counter when placed near a plasma globe. Participants explore potential explanations for this phenomenon, considering aspects of electrical engineering, radio frequency interference, and the nature of the plasma globe itself. The conversation includes technical reasoning and hypotheses regarding the interaction between the plasma globe and the Geiger counter.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the plasma globe emits what appears to be significant radiation, with readings exceeding 20,000 counts per minute, and suggests that this could be due to electrical interference affecting the Geiger counter.
  • Another participant mentions that plasma globes can create radio frequency interference, which may influence Geiger counter readings.
  • It is proposed that the Geiger counter may detect high-frequency electromagnetic fields similar to how fluorescent tubes light up near plasma globes.
  • A participant discusses the nature of cold plasma and how electron avalanches within the globe could lead to ionization, potentially producing detectable radiation.
  • Concerns are raised about the role of paper as a shielding material, with one participant noting that it can block certain wavelengths but may not be effective against all forms of radiation.
  • There is speculation about whether beta particles could be emitted from the plasma globe, with some participants questioning the mechanisms involved and suggesting tests to differentiate between radio frequency interference and beta radiation.
  • One participant recounts an experiment where the Geiger counter detected "radiation" when placed in specific orientations relative to the plasma globe and a cell phone, suggesting a complex interaction at play.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about how to modify their homebuilt Geiger counter to test for high voltage effects.
  • There is a suggestion that photographic film could be used to determine if the plasma globe emits ionizing radiation, although this remains speculative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of hypotheses regarding the cause of the Geiger counter readings, with no consensus reached on a single explanation. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of the detected "radiation" and the mechanisms involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of the interactions between the plasma globe and the Geiger counter, including the potential for various forms of radiation and interference. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the effectiveness of different shielding materials and the specific characteristics of the Geiger counter used.

Zackary Miller
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
The reason I did not place this in the nuclear engineering forum is because I feel that it is closer to an electrical engineering problem than a nuclear engineering problem.Now to the question.

I recently got another geiger counter and a plasma globe for my birthday. Being the person I am I used the geiger counter on anything I could and compared it to my other geiger counter. I also used it on my plasma globe and found something a tad out of the ordinary. The plasma globe seemingly emits not insignificant amounts of radiation. By not insignificant I mean in excess of 20 000 counts per minute.

I also put paper in front of my geiger counter and noted that it did stop the "radiation" (I use scare quotes because I do not know what it is at this point) until I moved it closer, then the device began to detect "radiation".

I then decided to put a magnet to my geiger counter. This had more interesting results. When I placed my magnet directly on the tube it caused it to detect "radiation" as normal, but when I put it just slightly to the side of the tube, not very far away from it, but only slightly to the side of it, it caused it to stop detecting so much "radiation" but still detect normal amounts of background.

Because it is likely that plasma globes would be banned for sale to unlicensed individuals if they emitted harmful amounts of ionizing radiation during operation I have decided that it is probably not a threat to me, but it is still mystifying for me to have my geiger counter go off when it is placed within a few centimeters of it.

My bet is on somehow the electricity jumping from the globe and causing ionization in the geiger tube, making my geiger counter act like it being exposed to a lot of radiation. Probably it picking up radio or other waves form the device and converting them to electricity. I would like confirmation on this because I really do not know that much about electrical engineering.So what do you think it is?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I see, exactly as I guessed, radio waves interfering with my geiger counter. Thanks for the help.
 
If that's the cause how do you explain...

Zackary Miller said:
I also put paper in front of my geiger counter and noted that it did stop the "radiation"
 
CWatters said:
If that's the cause how do you explain... [The paper thing]

The plasma from a plasma globe is a cold plasma. That means the heat in the atoms does not follow a thermal curve (like a candle flame does). Instead it is caused by an electron avalanche. An electron in the globe is knocked out of its atom by background radiation. The electric field accelerates the electron to high speed. It then strikes another atom, knocking out another electron and emitting a photon. Both electrons now accelerate. (The resulting positive ions move slower in the opposite direction.) Rinse and repeat.

The photons meanwhile zip off to eyeballs or wherever. Some of them add to the discharge. Some of them leave the globe and strike atoms in the air, ionizing them. This leaves free electrons (and ions) for the Geiger counter to detect. It's possible your Geiger counter can detect the photons directly depending on its construction (The reading window can be made of different substances to block UV, different particles, etc.).

Paper will block the violet/UV photons as well as the free electrons. A magnet can draw an electron off course.

I could be wrong about this. You could test it by checking to see what your other radiation detectors detect. Different detectors will be sensitive to different wavelengths/radiation. Or you could trust me.:devil:
 
GM tubes will count whatever beta makes it through their thin skin.
Beta radiation being simply electrons in motion, one wonders whether plasma globes might make a little of it.

I don't know the answer.

The test for "Is it RFI or Beta?" would be to turn off the high voltage to the GM tube. Easier said than done, though.
 
Some UV light might be a plausible explanation. It is produced inside. The glass should absorb most of it, but maybe that is not perfect. On the other hand, paper is not such a great UV absorber.
 
jim hardy said:
GM tubes will count whatever beta makes it through their thin skin.
Beta radiation being simply electrons in motion, one wonders whether plasma globes might make a little of it.

I don't know the answer.

The test for "Is it RFI or Beta?" would be to turn off the high voltage to the GM tube. Easier said than done, though.
The reason I recently got another GM counter is because the first was a homebuilt one. So how would turn off the high voltage? Do I rewire my GM counter a bit so that it bypasses the HV power supply?

Oh, and another thing beta radiation would explain the magnet seemingly blocking the radiation when it was placed slightly to the side of the GM tube. Still the gieger counter being overloaded at about four centimeters would mean that that is one hell of a beta emitter.

If I were to put photographic film in a cardboard box, put it next to the plasma globe for a few hours in operation, and then develop it later, and the film were black, would that tell me that the globe was emitting beta particles or some other form of ionizing radiation?
mfb said:
Some UV light might be a plausible explanation. It is produced inside. The glass should absorb most of it, but maybe that is not perfect. On the other hand, paper is not such a great UV absorber.
The paper was not a good shield at all, only giving my geiger counter an extra few centimeters before it would become overloaded by it. An entire book (War and Peace to be precise) would not provide enough shielding for it to be touching the book as the book touched the plasma lamp and not go off. However that would not explain the seeming shielding effect of the magnet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mgkii
  • #10
Zackary Miller said:
The reason I recently got another GM counter is because the first was a homebuilt one. So how would turn off the high voltage? Do I rewire my GM counter a bit so that it bypasses the HV power supply?

Homebuilt - BRAVO for YOU !

got schematic ?
Lift the wire carrying DC to the hv oscillator ? Or the hi meg dropping resistor in series with tube ?
 
  • #11
I I know I said HF EMI, but I take that back. I vote for electrons (which was my first instinct, until I "researched" it. I got myself "bam-googled")
 
  • #12
jim hardy said:
Homebuilt - BRAVO for YOU !

got schematic ?
Lift the wire carrying DC to the hv oscillator ? Or the hi meg dropping resistor in series with tube ?
The second is the current setup I have, unfortunately I cannot so easily take it apart so I will have to leave it alone.

____________________________________

I left my geiger counter on top of my cell phone and turned on my plasma globe. While touching the plasma globe with the geiger counter out of the range of the "radiation" I noted that my geiger counter would detect "radiation". This detection of "radiation" would stop when I removed the phone or when I stopped touching the plasma globe. The detection of "radiation" also only occurred when my phone and geiger counter had direct line of site to the plasma globe.

This does not look like any beta particles that I know of.Also:

If I were to put photographic film in a cardboard box, put it next to the plasma globe for a few hours in operation, and then develop it later, and the film were black, would that tell me that the globe was emitting beta particles or some other form of ionizing radiation?
 
  • #13
Maybe the plasma to anode collision is generating very soft X-rays that pass through the GM tube window but not damp paper ?
Plasma balls do not have a lead glass screen as used on colour CRTs.
 
  • #14
Baluncore said:
Maybe the plasma to anode collision is generating very soft X-rays that pass through the GM tube window but not damp paper ?
Plasma balls do not have a lead glass screen as used on colour CRTs.

Than how do you explain my iphone somehow being set off by it as explained here? I am not arguing with you, I just want your take on the situation.

Zackary Miller said:
I left my geiger counter on top of my cell phone and turned on my plasma globe. While touching the plasma globe with the geiger counter out of the range of the "radiation" I noted that my geiger counter would detect "radiation". This detection of "radiation" would stop when I removed the phone or when I stopped touching the plasma globe. The detection of "radiation" also only occurred when my phone and geiger counter had direct line of site to the plasma globe.

This does not look like any beta particles that I know of.Also:

If I were to put photographic film in a cardboard box, put it next to the plasma globe for a few hours in operation, and then develop it later, and the film were black, would that tell me that the globe was emitting beta particles or some other form of ionizing radiation?
 
  • #15
There are too many poorly designed unknowns here to be conclusive. Was your hand touching the globe or was the GM detector touching the globe?
 
  • #16
Baluncore said:
There are too many poorly designed unknowns here to be conclusive. Was your hand touching the globe or was the GM detector touching the globe?

I was touching the globe, the GM counter was around three feet from the globe. The GM detector was also touching my iphone during this. And yes, I really should of worded that better.
 
  • #17
Your hand might conduct electrostatic RFI, or block higher energy radiation.

Cheap electronics is unreliable unless it is stand alone. It seems you have RFI incompatibilities between plasma ball, the electronics in the Geiger and mobile phone. A spark transmitter generates very broadband RF clicks.

Experiment: Use an AM radio, (tuned between stations), to listen to the hiss and clicks. Turn up the volume and listen to the character of nearby switching power supplies & etc, Then turn on the plasma ball. You should hear the wide band spark impulses that are upsetting the electronic detector and amplifier of the GM tube and the phone.
 
  • #18
Zackary Miller said:
Than how do you explain my iphone somehow being set off by it as explained here?

My wild guess is that the cell phone acts as a nearfield antenna for RF radiation.

I've seen something similar happen with Tesla coils. The theory is that two resonant LC tanks will transfer power between them. My guess is the high voltage source in the globe is resonating with the cell phone. Once again, this sets up an electron avalanche.

This can be checked with the line of sight thing. Is it actually line of sight? Or is it distance? If you intervene with wood (paper) does that change things? What about dielectrics such as plastic or glass?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
10K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K