Why Is Pr(X=#) Zero in Continuous Distributions?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eMac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity Correction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The probability of a specific value in continuous distributions, denoted as Pr(X=#), is zero due to the nature of infinite sets and the requirement for probabilities to sum to one. In finite distributions, such as a uniform distribution over {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, the probability of any single outcome is non-zero (1/6). However, in infinite distributions, defining a uniform probability is impossible because the sum of probabilities must remain finite. Instead, probabilities are assigned to intervals or areas, where the measure of a single point is zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of probability distributions, particularly continuous versus discrete distributions.
  • Familiarity with concepts of measure theory and how it applies to probability.
  • Knowledge of uniform distributions and their characteristics.
  • Basic understanding of geometric series and their convergence properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of continuous probability distributions, focusing on the concept of measure.
  • Learn about the implications of defining probability measures on infinite sets.
  • Explore the differences between discrete and continuous distributions in depth.
  • Investigate geometric series and their applications in probability theory.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in statistics, mathematicians, and data scientists who seek to deepen their understanding of probability theory, particularly in the context of continuous distributions.

eMac
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I was wondering why it is that the Pr(x=#)=0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
? As usual with one line questions, that makes no sense at all. Take a few lines to say what you are talking about. I can guess that "P(x= #)" means the probability that the random variable is a specific given number. But that makes no sense without saying what probability distribution you are talking about. And, indeed, for many distributions, what you are saying, that the probability of a singleton set is 0, is simply not true. For example, if my underlying set is {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} and the probability distribution is the uniform distribution, then the probability of anyone number is 1/6, not 0.

I suspect you knew that but were talking about infinite probability distributions. But even then, it is not true that the probability of a single number must be 0. For example, I can define a probability distribution on the set of all positive integers such that [/itex]P(n)= 1/2^{n+1}[/itex]. The sum of all probabilities is a geometric series that sums to 1. Or I can define a probability distribution on [0, 1] such that P(1/2)= 1 and P(x)= 0 for all other numbers in [0, 1].

It is, however, impossible to have a uniform distribution on an infinite set with each outcome having non-zero probility because the infinite sum of a constant is not finite and so cannot be equal to 1, which is required for a probability distribution. Typically what is done is to define the "events" to be subsets of the set of all possible outcomes and define some "measure" of the set, say, length of an interval for one-dimensional problems and area for two-dimensional problems. Then the "probability" of an interval or area is its length or area divided by the length or area of the set of all outcomes. Of course, the "length" or "area" of an individual point is 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K