Why Is the Antiderivative the Same as the Area Under the Curve?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the relationship between antiderivatives and the area under the curve, emphasizing that an antiderivative is a function while an integral represents a real number. Participants highlight the importance of understanding the distinction between these concepts, particularly through the lens of calculus. The standard proof involves analyzing the graph of a continuous function and applying limits to demonstrate how the derivative of the area function relates to the original function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, including derivatives and integrals
  • Familiarity with continuous functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of limits and their application in calculus
  • Ability to interpret graphical representations of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to grasp the connection between differentiation and integration
  • Read "The Mathematical Universe" by William Dunham, focusing on chapters D, K, and L
  • Practice solving problems involving antiderivatives and area calculations under curves
  • Explore graphical interpretations of functions and their derivatives to enhance understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the relationship between antiderivatives and the area under curves.

jd12345
Messages
251
Reaction score
2
Why is antiderivative and area under the curve the same thing? Its not at all intuitive to me

Derivative is the slope at a point and its opposite is area?? Can someone just explain me why when we are finding an antiderivative, we are actually finding area under the curve

i don't buy the fact that slope of a curve and area under the curve ae opposite of each other
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh my! Right now you're undergoing your very first mathematical crisis! I've been there some years ago and trust me, eventually you will understand it.

I recommend you read a book by William Dunham, "The mathematical universe" chapters D, K and L.

It's something you must discover by your own. For now I can just say that you are confusing "antiderivative" with "integral", which are quite different things. The first is a function, while the later is a real number.
 
The standard proof is this- look at the graph of y= f(x), a continuous. Let the area under the curve, above y= 0, and between x= a and x, be F(x). Let [itex]x^*[/itex] be a value x at which F takes its maximum, [itex]x_*[/itex] a value at which F takes its minimum on [a, x]. Then we must have [itex]f(x_*)(x- a)\le F(x)\le f(x^*)(x- a)[/itex]. Then
[tex]\frac{F(x_*)}{x- a}\le f(x)\le\frac{F(x^*)}{x- a}[/tex]
Because both x* and [itex]x_*[/itex] are between a and x, if we take the limit as x goes to a, x* and [itex]x_*[/itex] will also both go to a. But then,
[tex]\lim_{x\to a}\frac{F(x_*)}{x-a}= \lim_{x\to a}\frac{F(x^*)}{x- a}= \frac{dF}{dx}[/tex] and we have
[tex]\frac{dF}{dx}\le f(x)\le \frac{dF}{dx}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K