Why Is the Coefficient of Restitution Less Than 1 in a Tennis Racket Collision?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The coefficient of restitution (COR) in a tennis racket collision is calculated using the formula: (Velocity before a - velocity before b) / (Velocity after a - velocity after b). In this discussion, a player strikes a ball traveling at 10 m/s into a stationary racket, resulting in the ball moving at 5 m/s and the racket moving at -1 m/s post-collision. The correct approach is to use the relative speeds after and before the collision, ensuring the signs are correctly applied to avoid erroneous results above 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the coefficient of restitution
  • Basic principles of physics related to collisions
  • Familiarity with velocity and direction concepts
  • Ability to perform calculations involving relative motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Learn about momentum conservation in collisions
  • Explore advanced topics in kinematics related to sports physics
  • Investigate real-world applications of the coefficient of restitution in sports equipment design
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, sports engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of collisions in sports, particularly in tennis racket performance analysis.

charlie1990
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. calculate the coefficient of restitution when a player hits a ball traveling into a racket at 10m/s and the racket is stationary before the ball hits it. after the ball hits it, the ball has a velocity of 5m/s and the racket is moving in the opposite direction at 1 m/s (Velocity before a - velocity before b)/(Velocity after a - velocity after b)
I know this is what's used to get the answer normally, but I am getting the wrong answer (above 1).


I think it has something to do with racket going opposite direction but not sure what to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
charlie1990 said:
(Velocity before a - velocity before b)/(Velocity after a - velocity after b)
You have that a bit backwards (or upside down). You want the relative speed after the collision over the relative speed before the collision.
 
Doc Al said:
You have that a bit backwards (or upside down). You want the relative speed after the collision over the relative speed before the collision.
cheers, poor mistake
 
charlie1990 said:
cheers, poor mistake
... and the sign reverses.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K