Why Is the Cross Section for e- + e+ -> γ Zero?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The cross section for the process e- + e+ -> γ is zero due to the violation of conservation laws, specifically charge conservation. In particle physics, this process cannot occur because it does not satisfy the requirements for a valid interaction as outlined by quantum electrodynamics (QED). The Feynman diagram approach confirms this, as the lowest order diagram does not yield a non-zero matrix element. Therefore, the conclusion is that this reaction is forbidden under the standard model of particle physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Familiarity with Feynman diagrams and their interpretation
  • Knowledge of conservation laws in particle physics
  • Ability to calculate cross sections using the formula dσ/dΩ = 1/64πs * M²
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation laws in particle interactions
  • Learn about Feynman diagrams and their role in calculating matrix elements
  • Explore the implications of charge conservation in particle physics
  • Investigate other processes with zero cross sections and their underlying reasons
USEFUL FOR

Students of particle physics, researchers in quantum electrodynamics, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental interactions of particles.

jennyjones
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am making an old exam of a particle physics course, and i know how to calculate the cross section for example for
bhabha or moller scattering.

now one of the questions on the old exam is:

Explain why e-+ e+ -> γ is zero, but i am not sure why this is, can someone explain this or point me in the right direction.

2.
I would usually when determining the cross section start with drawing the lowest order feynman diagram, my book put t on the x axis, and the determine the vertex and propagator factors, so i can determine the matrix element.

than with the formula dσ/dΩ = 1/64*pi*s * M^2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it perhaps violate some conservation law? Do you even need to draw a Feynman diagram to come to this conclusion?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K