Why is the Electric Field Zero at the Center of a Charged Ring?

Click For Summary
The electric field at the center of a charged ring is zero due to the uniform distribution of charge around it. This configuration can be likened to a hollow sphere, where excess charge resides on the surface, resulting in no electric field within. The concept of electrostatic equilibrium applies, as the charges are balanced and do not create an internal field. A Gaussian surface inside the ring confirms that the net electric flux and electric field are zero, as there is no net charge enclosed. Therefore, the electric field at the center of a charged ring is indeed zero.
mike115
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A circular ring of charge of radius b has a total charge q uniformly distributed around it. The magnitude of the electric field at the center of the ring is:
[Answer: 0]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


From the problem, do you just assume that the circular ring is a conductor? And since the charge is uniformly distributed, the conductor is in electrostatic equilibrium and there is no electric field? I'm not quite sure on how to think through it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mike115 said:

Homework Statement


A circular ring of charge of radius b has a total charge q uniformly distributed around it.

Isn't that technically the same as a hollow sphere with charges uniformly distributed around it?
 
Ah, I guess it is. Can you tell me if this explanation is correct?

All the excess charge in the conductor must be located at the surface of the conductor. If we construct a Gaussian surface inside the shell, the net electric flux and the electric field are both zero since there is no net charge inside the conductor.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
861
Replies
10
Views
2K