Why is the energy not conserved when adding waves?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Daker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Waves
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of energy in the context of wave superposition. Participants explore the implications of adding wave amplitudes and how this affects the energy associated with the resultant wave, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the logic behind energy conservation when two waves are superimposed, noting that the resultant energy appears to be greater than the sum of the individual energies.
  • Another participant suggests that while wave superposition is valid, energy cannot be simply added due to the nature of energy being proportional to the square of the amplitude.
  • A third participant introduces the concept of work done by wave generators, indicating that the power required to create waves may vary based on their interaction and phase relationship.
  • Participants express appreciation for the insights shared, indicating that the discussion is helpful in understanding the complexities involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the issue of energy conservation in wave superposition, with multiple competing views presented regarding how energy should be calculated and the role of wave generators.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of definitions and assumptions related to energy and wave interactions, as well as the potential influence of phase relationships on power requirements.

Daker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

There is something wrong with this logic. Anyone see the flaw.

If we have a wave in y traveling along the z axis y= y_0cos(kz-wt) then the energy it carries is proportional to y_0^2. If we superimpose a second wave with the same amplitude (and so the same energy) and in phase with the first wave then we add the amplitudes to get a wave described by y= 2y0cos(kz-wt). The energy in this wave is proportional to the amplitude squared i.e. 4y_0^2. But energy is not conserved between the two initial waves and the resultant wave i.e y_0^2+y_0^2 \ne 4y_0^2.

Similarly if the waves are pi out of phase the resultant is zero and in this case y_0^2+y_0^2 = 0!

Sorry for being dumb!

Daker
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the reason is, that even though you can superposition waves, you can't simply add the enrgies - for the exact reason you mentioned.
We have the same problem with EM-fields, since the energy here is also proportional to E or B squared.
I think you just have to re-calculate the energy/intensity.
 
You need to include the work done by whatever is creating the waves.

If a single plane wave is transmitting power P, then whatever creates the wave also requires power P.

But if you then put a second "identical" wave generator in the path of the first wave, in general it requires a different amount of power to operate it, because it is also interacting with the first wave. The power required depends on the phase angle between the force and the motion of the wave.
 
Thank you AlephZero and jeppetrost for these comments - very helpful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
885
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K