Why is the fluorine atom a poor hydrogen bond acceptor?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The fluorine atom is a poor hydrogen bond acceptor due to its high electronegativity, which causes it to hold onto its lone pair of electrons too tightly. This characteristic limits its ability to form covalent interactions necessary for strong hydrogen bonding. However, the hydrogen bond in the ion FHF- is one of the strongest known, indicating that fluorine can participate in hydrogen bonding under specific conditions. The discussion clarifies that the confusion arises from differentiating between the elemental fluorine and fluorine-containing compounds like HF.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electronegativity and its effects on chemical bonding
  • Knowledge of hydrogen bonding and its covalent and electrostatic components
  • Familiarity with the periodic table and the properties of halogens
  • Basic concepts of molecular geometry and lone pair interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of electronegativity in molecular interactions
  • Study the properties and behaviors of hydrogen fluoride (HF) in hydrogen bonding
  • Explore the differences between hydrogen bonds and dipole-dipole interactions
  • Investigate the hydrogen bonding capabilities of other halogens and their compounds
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, researchers in molecular chemistry, and anyone interested in the properties of hydrogen bonding and electronegativity in chemical interactions.

sgstudent
Messages
726
Reaction score
3
My notes states that fluorine is too highly electronegative and hence clings on too tightly to its lone pair of electrons and so it cannot accept hydrogen bonds as well. However, it also stated that a hydrogen bond will be stronger if the electron density on the electron rich atom the stronger the hydrogen bond. These 2 statements seem to contradict though.

I read online from this link http://www.quora.com/Why-can-chlorine-atoms-not-form-hydrogen-bonds-even-though-they-have-very-similar-electronegativity-to-nitrogen-which-can that a hydrogen bond has an electrostatic component, but what differentiates it from a dipole-dipole interaction is that it also has a covalent component. And since the F clings onto its electrons too tightly it would not want to form a covalent bond which is why its a poor HBA and forms weak hydrogen bonds.

So is the second statement wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
sgstudent said:
My notes states that fluorine is too highly electronegative and hence clings on too tightly to its lone pair of electrons and so it cannot accept hydrogen bonds as well.
I wouldn't sign that. The hydrogen bond in the ion FHF##^-## is one of the strongest known.
 
It's not clear what this statement means: "fluorine is too highly electronegative and hence clings on too tightly to its lone pair of electrons and so it cannot accept hydrogen bonds as well."

Fluorine, atomic number 9, has 7 electrons in its valence shell, hence it is lacking 1 electron to have a full complement, which is why it is grouped with the halogens in the Periodic Table.
 
SteamKing said:
Fluorine, atomic number 9, has 7 electrons in its valence shell, hence it is lacking 1 electron to have a full complement, which is why it is grouped with the halogens in the Periodic Table.
And how does this contradict the fact that fluorine, also has lone pairs that participate in hydrogen bonding?
I think it is also amply clear from the context that sgstudent is not talking about a fluorine atom but some fluorine compounds like HF.
 
DrDu said:
And how does this contradict the fact that fluorine, also has lone pairs that participate in hydrogen bonding?
I think it is also amply clear from the context that sgstudent is not talking about a fluorine atom but some fluorine compounds like HF.
That's funny, because his notes didn't say anything about fluorine compounds, just fluorine.
 
Even a fluorine atom has 3 lone pairs ...
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
11K
Replies
16
Views
24K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K