Why is the fluorine atom a poor hydrogen bond acceptor?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 5K views
sgstudent
Messages
726
Reaction score
3
My notes states that fluorine is too highly electronegative and hence clings on too tightly to its lone pair of electrons and so it cannot accept hydrogen bonds as well. However, it also stated that a hydrogen bond will be stronger if the electron density on the electron rich atom the stronger the hydrogen bond. These 2 statements seem to contradict though.

I read online from this link http://www.quora.com/Why-can-chlorine-atoms-not-form-hydrogen-bonds-even-though-they-have-very-similar-electronegativity-to-nitrogen-which-can that a hydrogen bond has an electrostatic component, but what differentiates it from a dipole-dipole interaction is that it also has a covalent component. And since the F clings onto its electrons too tightly it would not want to form a covalent bond which is why its a poor HBA and forms weak hydrogen bonds.

So is the second statement wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
sgstudent said:
My notes states that fluorine is too highly electronegative and hence clings on too tightly to its lone pair of electrons and so it cannot accept hydrogen bonds as well.
I wouldn't sign that. The hydrogen bond in the ion FHF##^-## is one of the strongest known.
 
It's not clear what this statement means: "fluorine is too highly electronegative and hence clings on too tightly to its lone pair of electrons and so it cannot accept hydrogen bonds as well."

Fluorine, atomic number 9, has 7 electrons in its valence shell, hence it is lacking 1 electron to have a full complement, which is why it is grouped with the halogens in the Periodic Table.
 
SteamKing said:
Fluorine, atomic number 9, has 7 electrons in its valence shell, hence it is lacking 1 electron to have a full complement, which is why it is grouped with the halogens in the Periodic Table.
And how does this contradict the fact that fluorine, also has lone pairs that participate in hydrogen bonding?
I think it is also amply clear from the context that sgstudent is not talking about a fluorine atom but some fluorine compounds like HF.
 
DrDu said:
And how does this contradict the fact that fluorine, also has lone pairs that participate in hydrogen bonding?
I think it is also amply clear from the context that sgstudent is not talking about a fluorine atom but some fluorine compounds like HF.
That's funny, because his notes didn't say anything about fluorine compounds, just fluorine.