Why is the friction force at A not considered in forces in equilibrium?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in statics, specifically addressing the forces acting on a rod connected to a plane at a hinge point. The original poster questions why the friction force at point A is not considered when resolving forces horizontally in the context of equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the reasoning behind excluding the friction force at point A, questioning how the hinge connection affects the forces acting on the block and rod system.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the role of the hinge and its reactions, with some participants suggesting that the horizontal reaction at the hinge counteracts any horizontal forces applied. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations regarding the effects of forces at point A on the overall system.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the rod is fixed at point A, which raises questions about the implications of this setup on the forces considered in equilibrium. The original problem statement and visual aids have been clarified for better understanding.

Faiq
Messages
347
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement



[moderator note: Post edited to make problem statement images visible]

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/question-jpg.113056/

My question is when forces are resolved horizontally, why is the friction force at A not taken into account?

The Attempt at a Solution


Find the value of u (in terms of W)

Note:- The W next to u in the picture is actually Reaction at D, R(d)
0a59be726d9a401fb209ac800bd64413.jpg


Given solution:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/forces-answer-jpg.113057/

In the given solution, why is the friction force at A not taken into account?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Moderator note: Thread cleaned up after amending the original post to clarify the problem.
 
I just want to know when they resolved the forces horizontally, why does their answer makes sense even though they didnt include the frictional force at point A
 
Faiq said:
I just want to know when they resolved the forces horizontally, why does their answer makes sense even though they didnt include the frictional force at point A
If you read the problem statement (which is now visible :smile:) , how is the rod joined to the plane at point A?
 
By a hinge
 
Faiq said:
By a hinge
Right. The hinge will be attached (probably bolted) to the floor. No sliding friction involved, the rod is firmly attached.
 
Oh but there will still be a reaction at the hinge and we have to take account the horizontal component of that
 
Faiq said:
Oh but there will still be a reaction at the hinge and we have to take account the horizontal component of that
Since it is fixed its horizontal reaction will be equal to and opposite of any horizontal force applied to it.

My interpretation of the shown solution is that they were concentrating on the block's FBD, where the local friction has to counter the other external forces applied to the block.
 
So even if there was a resultant horizontal force at A, it won't effect the block?
 
  • #10
Faiq said:
So even if there was a resultant horizontal force at A, it won't effect the block?
Not if the system is in equilibrium. Only forces applied directly to the block affect the block.
 
  • #11
But the force at A will effect the rod which will effect the block
 
  • #12
Faiq said:
But the force at A will effect the rod which will effect the block
The rod does not move. Nothing moves. How can the force at A affect how the rod presses on the block? That was determined by taking moments about A.

It is enough to know that the rod cannot slip at A.
 
  • #13
oh Okay thank you. Can you also help me in another question
 
  • #14
Faiq said:
oh Okay thank you. Can you also help me in another question
Start a new thread for it and I or someone else will be happy to help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
7K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K