Why is the induced EMF on an inductor equal to -L (di/dt)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zero_kilo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Inductor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The induced electromotive force (EMF) on an inductor is defined by the equation E = -L (di/dt), where L represents inductance and di/dt is the rate of change of current. The negative sign indicates that the induced EMF opposes changes in current, adhering to Lenz's Law. In scenarios where work is done to drive current through the inductor, the applied EMF can be expressed as E = +L (di/dt) to reflect the positive work required to overcome the induced EMF. This distinction is crucial for understanding energy storage in inductors and the dynamics of circuits involving inductance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inductance and its role in electrical circuits
  • Familiarity with Lenz's Law and its implications for EMF
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, specifically integration
  • Experience with circuit analysis involving resistors and inductors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Lenz's Law in greater detail
  • Explore the relationship between inductance and energy storage in inductors
  • Learn about the applications of inductors in AC and DC circuits
  • Investigate the effects of varying current on induced EMF in practical circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and circuit design will benefit from this discussion.

zero_kilo
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
so the amount of work done to drive the current through the inductor is given by

dw=Eidt where E is the emf of the variable voltage source.We put E=+L (di/dt).

can you please tell me why we put that value?? (i know the induced e.m.f on the inductor is - L (di/dt)

thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
while calculating the amount of work done we have to take the integration. For that we have to reduce the expression of dw in single variable
So dw = Eidt = L*i*di/dt*dt = L*i*di.
Now take integrations to get the energy stored in the inductor.
 
rl.bhat said:
while calculating the amount of work done we have to take the integration. For that we have to reduce the expression of dw in single variable
So dw = Eidt = L*i*di/dt*dt = L*i*di.
Now take integrations to get the energy stored in the inductor.

thanks but this is what i actually asked

zero_kilo said:
We put E=+L (di/dt).
can you please tell me why we put that value??
thanks :smile:

why we put E=+L dI/dt for the applied e.mf:confused:
 
zero_kilo said:
why we put E=+L dI/dt for the applied e.mf:confused:

Consider the equation E = -L di/dt. The minus sign in the equation indicates that the induced EMF has an orientation that opposes the the change in current.

The reason why it's positive for your given equation, is because positive work must be done to induce the current. We need only the magnitude of E then.
 
buffordboy23 said:
Consider the equation E = -L di/dt. The minus sign in the equation indicates that the induced EMF has an orientation that opposes the the change in current.

The reason why it's positive for your given equation, is because positive work must be done to induce the current. We need only the magnitude of E then.

thanks :smile: but why to drive the current through the circuit so as to defeat the induced e.m.f -L di/dt we need Ldi/dt; don't we not need a greater value??

thanks again.
 
The induced emf is Ldi/dt; the negative sign just indicates it opposes the battery's emf. The electrons pushed through the inductor must overcome a voltage of Ldi/dt (that is, they must overcome an increase in potential of magnitude Ldi/dt), so they gain Lidi/dt of potential energy per unit time. This gain in potential is what the energy stored in the inductor really is.
 
ideasrule said:
The induced emf is Ldi/dt; the negative sign just indicates it opposes the battery's emf.

I don't think that this is quite correct.

Consider a circuit with an applied emf, resistor, and inductor, where the current varies with time. If the current is increasing (di/dt > 0 ), then the self-induced emf opposes the direction of the applied emf. If the current is decreasing (di/dt < 0), the self-induced emf is actually oriented in the same direction as the applied emf.

In both cases, the self-induced emf has orientation that always opposes the "change in current", not the "applied emf."
 
thanks :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
912
Replies
4
Views
916
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
7K