Why Is the Middle Term in the QED Field Strength Tensor Commutator Non-Zero?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the non-zero middle term in the QED field strength tensor commutator, specifically in the context of equations 15.15 and 15.16 from Peskin. The user understands that the first and last commutators are zero due to the properties of abelian gauge theory and commuting partial derivatives. However, they are confused about the term involving the gauge field A, which leads to the expression F_{\mu \nu} = \partial _\mu A_\nu - \partial _{\nu} A_\mu. The user seeks clarification on why the term (-A_\nu∂_μ + A_μ∂_ν) should equal zero. The discussion references a previous thread for additional insights on the topic.
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Messages
6,735
Reaction score
2,434
Hi, I was reading earlier today in Peskin about QED field strenght tensor:

equation 15.15 and 15.16
[D_\mu, D_\nu ] \psi= [\partial _\mu , \partial _\nu ] \psi + ([\partial _\mu, A_\nu] - [\partial _\nu, A_\mu]) \psi + [A_\mu,A_\nu] \psi


Where A is the gauge field...

That part, I have control over.

Now I know that the first and last commutator is zero (abelian gauge theory and partial derivatives commute), but the middle one is really bothering me!

I obtain:

(\partial _\mu A_\nu - \partial _{\nu} A_\mu) \psi + (-A_\nu\partial _\mu + A_\mu \partial _\nu) \psi

And that last (-A_\nu\partial _\mu + A_\mu \partial _\nu) \psi should be ZERO, so that:

F_{\mu \nu} = [D_\mu, D_\nu ] = \partial _\mu A_\nu - \partial _{\nu} A_\mu

BUT I don't know why ...

Any help or insight would, I would be very thankful of :shy:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I found an older thread "Yang Mills field stress tensor" where George Jones gave an excellent answer!

:-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K