Why is the the first order useful?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Choisai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    First order
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the utility of the first order of diffraction in systems utilizing Acoustic Optical Light Modulators (AOLM) and Digital Micromirror Devices (DMD). The first order is preferred due to its higher power compared to higher orders, while the zeroth order is deemed unmodulated and ineffective for signal transmission. The zeroth order consists of light that passes through the grating without being altered by the modulation process, rendering it unsuitable for applications requiring signal manipulation. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how modulation affects light behavior in optical systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Acoustic Optical Light Modulators (AOLM)
  • Knowledge of diffraction principles and orders
  • Familiarity with Digital Micromirror Devices (DMD)
  • Basic concepts of refractive index modulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of diffraction and its orders in optical systems
  • Explore the functionality and applications of Acoustic Optical Light Modulators (AOLM)
  • Learn about Digital Micromirror Devices (DMD) and their operational mechanisms
  • Investigate the effects of refractive index changes on light modulation
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, physicists, and researchers involved in the design and application of modulation techniques in optical systems will benefit from this discussion.

Choisai
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
I've been looking into diffraction for AOLM and stuff like that, and these produce diffraction. Binary Spatial Light Modulators like Digital Micromirror Devices also produce diffraction. This diffraction is then focused and filtered using a pinhole. But, and here is the question:

Why is always the first order of diffraction used and not the zeroth order?

The first order has more power than the 2nd, 3rd or other higher orders. That's something I get. But why is the zeroth order of diffraction not used? I've been seeing on several websites that the zeroth order is not 'modulated', but why isn't it? Isn't the zeroth order just as valid to use as the 1st? I have added an image of a 4f system and you can see it discards the zeroth order. Why?

EDIT: AOLM stands for Acoustic Optical Light Modulator (more commonly known as just AOM) and adds the frequency of soundwaves to light. For an example, if you want to add several MHz to light (of several THz) you can do so using an AOLM.
 

Attachments

  • 4f setup.png
    4f setup.png
    6.4 KB · Views: 591
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you really expect us to know what AOLM means? You got to be kidding. Even without really knowing what you mean, it's clear that the zeroth order is no good because it is not modulated. That means the signal you're looking for won't show up in the zeroth order fringe.
 
I get the zeroth order is not modulated, but why is the zeroth order not modulated?

PS: I added an explanation of what an AOLM is to my question
 
Choisai said:
I get the zeroth order is not modulated, but why is the zeroth order not modulated?

PS: I added an explanation of what an AOLM is to my question

Ask yourself this question: what is the AOM doing to the lens? How does this change with frequency?
 
It uses sound wave to change the refractive index. This index-modulation creates relatively more opaque and less opaque area, which acts like a grating. The zeroth order is made up of light coming through this grating, but I guess that isn't the part that gets refracted by the change in index? And therefore the zeroth order is the unmodulated order?

If these assumptions of mine are correct, how do they extend to more general applications, such Digital Micromirror Devices that use pinhole filtering? There is no change in refractive index when you use a DMD, only tiny micromirrors (usually 10 micron in size).
 
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
40K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K