Why is the Triangle Set Not Closed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter E7.5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of closed sets in topology, specifically focusing on a triangle and its boundary points. Participants are examining whether a triangle, particularly when one edge is omitted, can be considered closed based on the definition of boundary points.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of closed sets and boundary points, questioning the implications of omitting an edge from the triangle. There is a focus on whether the remaining shape can still be considered closed despite missing boundary points.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants clarifying definitions and questioning assumptions about closed sets. Some guidance is provided regarding the relationship between boundary points and the inclusion of edges in determining whether a set is closed.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the implications of omitting edges from the triangle and how that affects the classification of the set as closed or not. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and properties of open and closed sets in topology.

E7.5
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Z37YCsM.png

Homework Equations


A set is closed if it contains alll of its boundary points.

A boundary point is a point where an open ball around that point has one point inside the ball that's in the set, and one point in the ball that's not in the set.

The Attempt at a Solution


As seen in the picture, I can create infinitely many open balls around the edges of the triangle, with the balls containing at least one point in the triangle (red point) and one point outside the triangle (blue point). Since the perimeter of the triangle has all the boundary points, this triangle should be closed, but it's not. Why isn't it, if it contains all its boundary points?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E7.5 said:

Homework Statement


Z37YCsM.png



Homework Equations


A set is closed if it contains alll of its boundary points.

A boundary point is a point where an open ball around that point has one point inside the ball that's in the set, and one point in the ball that's not in the set.


The Attempt at a Solution


As seen in the picture, I can create infinitely many open balls around the edges of the triangle, with the balls containing at least one point in the triangle (red point) and one point outside the triangle (blue point). Since the perimeter of the triangle has all the boundary points, this triangle should be closed, but it's not. Why isn't it, if it contains all its boundary points?

If you mean that the set in question is the interior of the triangle with all of the boundary edges included then it is closed. If you mean the interior of the triangle with one boundary edge omitted, (which drawing the dashed line usually means) then it's not closed. What do you mean?
 
Dick said:
If you mean that the set in question is the interior of the triangle with all of the boundary edges included then it is closed. If you mean the interior of the triangle with one boundary edge omitted, (which drawing the dashed line usually means) then it's not closed. What do you mean?

I mean the interior of the triangle with one edge omitted. Why is it not closed then, according to the fact that a set is closed if it contains all of its boundary points? Doesn't the figure, even with one edge omitted, contain all the boundary points of its edges?
 
E7.5 said:
I mean the interior of the triangle with one edge omitted. Why is it not closed then, according to the fact that a set is closed if it contains all of its boundary points? Doesn't the figure, even with one edge omitted, contain all the boundary points of its edges?

It doesn't contain the edge you omitted. The edge contains boundary points (as your diagram shows) but the edge isn't in the set.
 
Dick said:
It doesn't contain the edge you omitted. The edge contains boundary points (as your diagram shows) but the edge isn't in the set.

So is it then not always true that a set is closed if it contains all of its boundary points?
 
E7.5 said:
So is it then not always true that a set is closed if it contains all of its boundary points?

No, it's always true that a closed set contains all of its boundary points. Your set ISN'T closed because it doesn't contain all of its boundary points. The missing edge contains boundary points, the missing edge isn't in the set. Is it?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Dick said:
No, it's always true that a closed set contains all of its boundary points. Your set ISN'T closed because it doesn't contain all of its boundary points. The missing edge contains boundary points, the missing edge isn't in the set. Is it?

But the missing edge is open, so there cannot be any points on that edge to be the center of a disc acting as a boundary point, can there?
 
Wouldn't that imply that all open sets are closed because they don't contain any edge points to act as the center of a disc acting as a boundary point?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
E7.5 said:
But the missing edge is open, so there cannot be any points on that edge to be the center of a disc acting as a boundary point, can there?

There are plenty of points on that "missing edge". They just aren't in your set.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K