Why is the work done counted twice in the 1st law of thermodynamics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter curious bishal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Thermodynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the application of the first law of thermodynamics, specifically addressing the confusion surrounding the counting of work done in energy calculations. The formula E2 = E1 + q - w is established, where E1 is the initial energy, q is the heat supplied, and w is the work done by the system. It is emphasized that work is not double-counted; instead, the energy change is accurately represented by considering the heat added and the work extracted. The distinction between work done on the system versus work done by the system is crucial for understanding energy transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the first law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with energy conservation principles
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic systems and processes
  • Basic mathematical skills for energy equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the first law of thermodynamics in closed systems
  • Explore the concept of work in thermodynamic processes
  • Learn about heat transfer mechanisms and their effects on energy
  • Investigate real-world applications of thermodynamic principles in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers in thermodynamics, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of energy transformations in physical systems.

curious bishal
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
On the way to prove 1st law of thermodynamics, you consider a system having initial energy E1. Then, you supply heat q to the system. Some part of the applied heat is used for doing work.
Then, again you consider the final energy (E2) of the system to be:
E2=E1+q+w
where w is the work done.

We all very well know that the work is done by the heat applied. If we add both heat applied and work done to the final energy, isn't the work done counted twice. I mean to say that the heat energy wasted in the work done is also consisted in q so why is there need to add w in the final energy E2.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I think the confusion here comes from whether w is the work done on the system, or the work done by the system. These change the energy by opposite amounts.

If the system is doing work w, the energy of the system decreases by w, so

E2=E1+q-w

Then, if q=w,
E2=E1
 
jfizzix said:
I think the confusion here comes from whether w is the work done on the system, or the work done by the system. These change the energy by opposite amounts.

If the system is doing work w, the energy of the system decreases by w, so

E2=E1+q-w

Then, if q=w,
E2=E1
It doesn't give the solution to my problem. Why is the work done counted double?
 
The work is not double-counted.

If the system starts at energy E1, and you add heat q to it, the energy has changed to amount E1'= E1+q.

If the system then performs work w on its environment, it loses w units of energy, so its energy changes to E2 = E1'-w = E1+q-w.

Though some of the heat is converted into work, that doesn't affect the fact that q units of heat were added, and w units of work are extracted. Thus the net energy change is q-w.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K