Why is there confusion with the sign in Hooke's Law equations?

Click For Summary
The confusion surrounding the signs in Hooke's Law equations arises from the choice of direction for positive displacement. When a mass is attached to a vertical spring, the weight (mg) acts downward, while the restoring force (Fk) acts upward, leading to the equation mg = Fk. The key point is that Fk is defined as -kΔy, indicating it opposes the direction of displacement, which is why it appears negative when downward is chosen as positive. To resolve the confusion, it's suggested to consistently define the positive direction based on the system's setup, ensuring that forces are correctly represented in vector form. Understanding these directional conventions clarifies the relationship between the forces and their signs.
smashX
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am currently doing some Hooke's Law problems. While I do not have any trouble with any exercise in particular, I do have trouble with the sign in the equation. Let's say I have a vertical spring and I attached a hanging mass m to it. The string will then stretch a distance Δy. I choose downward as positive.

Therefore, applying Newton's Second Law gives: Fnet = mg - Fk (Fk is the restored force given by Hooke's Law).

Since the vertical spring is at equilibrium, Fnet = 0. Therefore, mg - Fk = 0, or mg = Fk

But Fk also equals -kΔy, where k is the spring constant and Δy is the positive displacement (I chose downward as positive).

So Fk = mg, which is a positive value. But Fk = -ky, which is negative? I know I must have done something wrong somewhere, but I couldn't figure out where. Could someone please help explaining this for me? Thank you very much. Any help is greatly appreciated.


Homework Equations


Fk = -ky (Hooke's Law)


The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to solve most of the problems by "forcing" myself to choose the correct sign; however, I still don't understand what I'm doing and why I got the correct result in the first place. I understand why there is a negative sign in the Hooke's Law equation, since it's a restored force and it must be inversely proportional to the displacement. Having said that, I still don't understand why my attempt above gave Fk both a positive, and a negative value. Please shed some light for me, thanks a lot.

Also, I apologize for the inconvenient notation. I don't know Latex or any other mathematical convention used in forum and typing documents, so please don't delete this thread. Thanks again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you had mg-Fk=0 that meant you already accounted for the spring having the restoring force with the minus sign. So Fk=ky here.
 
Thanks, but I thought Fk having a negative sign was just from the diagram for this case? I mean Fk is pointing upward, right? Since I chose downward as positive, mg-Fk = 0, then I substituted Fk for -ky and got the wrong answer. I kind of get your explanation, but I'm still confused... I'm really sorry, but could you please explain this problem in any way easier to understand. Thanks a lot
 
smashX said:

Homework Statement


I am currently doing some Hooke's Law problems. While I do not have any trouble with any exercise in particular, I do have trouble with the sign in the equation. Let's say I have a vertical spring and I attached a hanging mass m to it. The string will then stretch a distance Δy. I choose downward as positive.

Therefore, applying Newton's Second Law gives: Fnet = mg - Fk (Fk is the restored force given by Hooke's Law).

Since the vertical spring is at equilibrium, Fnet = 0. Therefore, mg - Fk = 0, or mg = Fk

But Fk also equals -kΔy, where k is the spring constant and Δy is the positive displacement (I chose downward as positive).

So Fk = mg, which is a positive value. But Fk = -ky, which is negative? I know I must have done something wrong somewhere, but I couldn't figure out where. Could someone please help explaining this for me? Thank you very much. Any help is greatly appreciated.


Homework Equations


Fk = -ky (Hooke's Law)


The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to solve most of the problems by "forcing" myself to choose the correct sign; however, I still don't understand what I'm doing and why I got the correct result in the first place. I understand why there is a negative sign in the Hooke's Law equation, since it's a restored force and it must be inversely proportional to the displacement. Having said that, I still don't understand why my attempt above gave Fk both a positive, and a negative value. Please shed some light for me, thanks a lot.

Also, I apologize for the inconvenient notation. I don't know Latex or any other mathematical convention used in forum and typing documents, so please don't delete this thread. Thanks again.

Choose up as positive and see if you still have conflict. If you don't get conflict that means that the positioning of the spring had already defined the positive direction, and you were not free to arbitrarily decide.
 
Another point of view:

There appears to be some trouble with direction. Hence let us take the trouble to put the problem in vector form.

Let \underline{d} be a unit vector pointing downwards.

The weight mg is downwards. Hence let mg be represented by mg\underline{d}.
The displacement \Deltay of the spring is downwards. Hence let this displacement be represented by \Deltay\underline{d}.

But the restoring force, of magnitude k\Deltay, due to the spring is upwards. Hence let us represent this restoring force by
-k\Deltay\underline{d}.

But mg\underline{d} + (- k\Deltay\underline{d}) = 0
i.e. mg\underline{d} = k\Deltay\underline{d}
which just shows that the weight and the restoring force are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction.
 
Thanks grzz, that REALLY helps. I think I finally understand now.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K