- #1
- 14,169
- 6,649
The Lagrangian density for cosmological constant is
$${\cal L} = \sqrt{g}\Lambda$$
Let us write, schematically,
$$g=\eta+h$$
where ##\eta## is the flat Minkowski metric and ##h## is the spin-2 field. Expanding the square root for small ##h## we get something like $${\cal L} = \Lambda + h\Lambda + h^2\Lambda + h^3\Lambda + ...$$
In particular, the term quadratic in ##h##, namely ##h^2\Lambda##, looks like a mass term for spin-2 field, suggesting that mass##^2## of the graviton is proportional to ##\Lambda##.
I'm sure there is something wrong with this naive argument, but can someone tell me more precisely what exactly is wrong?
$${\cal L} = \sqrt{g}\Lambda$$
Let us write, schematically,
$$g=\eta+h$$
where ##\eta## is the flat Minkowski metric and ##h## is the spin-2 field. Expanding the square root for small ##h## we get something like $${\cal L} = \Lambda + h\Lambda + h^2\Lambda + h^3\Lambda + ...$$
In particular, the term quadratic in ##h##, namely ##h^2\Lambda##, looks like a mass term for spin-2 field, suggesting that mass##^2## of the graviton is proportional to ##\Lambda##.
I'm sure there is something wrong with this naive argument, but can someone tell me more precisely what exactly is wrong?