I Why isn't the Lagrangian invariant under ##\theta## rotations?

AI Thread Summary
The Lagrangian for a particle in a radially symmetric potential, expressed in spherical coordinates, reveals that it is invariant under shifts in the azimuthal angle ##\varphi## but not under shifts in the polar angle ##\theta##. This lack of invariance arises because the Lagrangian explicitly depends on ##\theta##, which affects the sine squared term. Consequently, while angular momentum is conserved in the system, only the component associated with ##\varphi##, specifically ##mr^2 \sin^2(\theta) \dot{\varphi}##, is conserved, not the full angular momentum. The introduction of spherical coordinates breaks the full rotational symmetry, limiting invariance to rotations around the polar axis. Thus, the conservation laws derived from Noether's theorem reflect these symmetries in the system.
PhysicsRock
Messages
121
Reaction score
19
TL;DR Summary
Lagrangian of a particle in radial potential isn't invariant under ##\theta## rotations.
I just calculated the Lagrangian of a particle of mass ##m## in a radially symmetric potential ##V(r)##. I thought it would be a good idea to switch to spherical coordinates for that matter. What I get is

$$
L = \frac{1}{2} m \left( \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\theta}^2 + r^2 \dot{\varphi}^2 \sin^2(\theta) \right) - V(r)
$$

This is typically a well-known result and I am very confident that it's correct. We instantly see that this Lagrangian does not depend on ##\varphi##, only on it's time derivative. Thus, we can introduce an infinitesimal rotational shift ##\delta\varphi##, which will not change the Lagrangian. However, a shift ##\delta\theta## does not leave this expression invariant, since ##\theta## explicitly appears in the Lagrangian. With radial symmetry though, I would expect that both angles can be altered infinitesimally without changing the physics of the system. Since ##\theta## appears in the sine squared term, we could introduce a discrete shift ##\delta\theta = n \pi## with ##n \in \mathbb{N}##. This, however, would not yield a conservation law, since Noether's theorem demands continuous symmetries. I would've expected that angular momentum is conserved here, but using said theorem, the only conserved quantity here would be

$$
\frac{d}{dt} \left( m r^2 \dot{\varphi} \sin^2(\theta) \right) = 0
$$

which looks like a component of angular momentum (EDIT: it is in fact the ##L_\theta## component), but not angular momentum completely.

Why is that?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A movement in the ##\theta## direction isn't a rigid rotation. It maps lines of constant latitude onto each other, and they don't have equal radius. Contrast a rotation in the ##\phi## direction that maps lines of constant longitude onto each other - they are all great circles.

There are Killing fields corresponding to rotations around the ##x## and ##y## axes (assuming rotation around ##z## is the ##\delta\phi## in your post), but they are not so cleanly expressed on spherical polars (slightly surprisingly, I agree).
 
  • Like
Likes strangerep, Dale and malawi_glenn
Ibix said:
A movement in the ##\theta## direction isn't a rigid rotation. It maps lines of constant latitude onto each other, and they don't have equal radius. Contrast a rotation in the ##\phi## direction that maps lines of constant longitude onto each other - they are all great circles.

There are Killing fields corresponding to rotations around the ##x## and ##y## axes (assuming rotation around ##z## is the ##\delta\phi## in your post), but they are not so cleanly expressed on spherical polars (slightly surprisingly, I agree).

So it is correct that only ##L_\theta \sin(\theta)## is conserved in such a system?
 
PhysicsRock said:
So it is correct that only ##L_\theta \sin(\theta)## is conserved in such a system?
A particle moving in a central potential will have an angular momentum (about the origin), ##\vec L##, that is conserved. The direction of ##\vec L## is perpendicular to the plane of motion of the particle.

Since ##\vec L## remains constant, the projection of ##\vec L## along any fixed axis in the inertial frame will be conserved. The quantity ##mr^2\sin^2\theta \, \dot{\varphi}## is the canonical momentum associated with the variable ##\varphi## and this quantity is the projection of ##\vec L## along the fixed z-axis. So this quantity is conserved.

The quantity ##mr^2 \dot{\theta}## is the canonical momentum associated with the variable ##\theta##. At some instant of time, this quantity is the projection of ##\vec L## along an axis that lies in the x-y plane and makes an angle ##\varphi## to the y-axis. But this axis is not a fixed axis (in general) since ##\varphi## will vary with time (in general). Thus, ##mr^2 \dot{\theta}## is generally not conserved.

I don't know if this helps.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and malawi_glenn
TSny said:
A particle moving in a central potential will have an angular momentum (about the origin), ##\vec L##, that is conserved. The direction of ##\vec L## is perpendicular to the plane of motion of the particle.

Since ##\vec L## remains constant, the projection of ##\vec L## along any fixed axis in the inertial frame will be conserved. The quantity ##mr^2\sin^2\theta \, \dot{\varphi}## is the canonical momentum associated with the variable ##\varphi## and this quantity is the projection of ##\vec L## along the fixed z-axis. So this quantity is conserved.

The quantity ##mr^2 \dot{\theta}## is the canonical momentum associated with the variable ##\theta##. At some instant of time, this quantity is the projection of ##\vec L## along an axis that lies in the x-y plane and makes an angle ##\varphi## to the y-axis. But this axis is not a fixed axis (in general) since ##\varphi## will vary with time (in general). Thus, ##mr^2 \dot{\theta}## is generally not conserved.

I don't know if this helps.
It does help a lot. Thank you.
 
PhysicsRock said:
TL;DR Summary: Lagrangian of a particle in radial potential isn't invariant under ##\theta## rotations.

I just calculated the Lagrangian of a particle of mass ##m## in a radially symmetric potential ##V(r)##. I thought it would be a good idea to switch to spherical coordinates for that matter. What I get is

$$
L = \frac{1}{2} m \left( \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\theta}^2 + r^2 \dot{\varphi}^2 \sin^2(\theta) \right) - V(r)
$$

This is typically a well-known result and I am very confident that it's correct. We instantly see that this Lagrangian does not depend on ##\varphi##, only on it's time derivative. Thus, we can introduce an infinitesimal rotational shift ##\delta\varphi##, which will not change the Lagrangian. However, a shift ##\delta\theta## does not leave this expression invariant, since ##\theta## explicitly appears in the Lagrangian. With radial symmetry though, I would expect that both angles can be altered infinitesimally without changing the physics of the system. Since ##\theta## appears in the sine squared term, we could introduce a discrete shift ##\delta\theta = n \pi## with ##n \in \mathbb{N}##. This, however, would not yield a conservation law, since Noether's theorem demands continuous symmetries. I would've expected that angular momentum is conserved here, but using said theorem, the only conserved quantity here would be

$$
\frac{d}{dt} \left( m r^2 \dot{\varphi} \sin^2(\theta) \right) = 0
$$

which looks like a component of angular momentum (EDIT: it is in fact the ##L_\theta## component), but not angular momentum completely.

Why is that?
From a symmetry point of view, it's because with spherical coordinates you introduce a perferred direction, i.e., the direction of the polar axis, along which the spherical coordinates are singular.

Rotational invariance is better expressed in terms of Cartesian coordinates. An infinitesimal rotation is defined by
$$\delta t=0, \quad \delta \vec{r} = \delta \vec{\varphi} \times \vec{r}.$$
Full rotation symmetry means you can take ##\delta \vec{\varphi}## in an arbitrary direction, and the Lagrangian invariant under this infinitesimal rotation.

By introducing spherical coordinates you distinguish one direction by introducing the polar axis, and the full rotation symmetry is thus broken to the symmetry under rotations only around the polar axis, and this residual symmetry is parametrized by ##\varphi##, which is thus a cyclic variable for a particle in a central potential.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes PhysicsRock, Ibix and malawi_glenn
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top