Why not categorize homework and textbook-related questions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter moonman239
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Creating specific categories for homework and textbook-related questions, such as "logic, set theory, probability and statistics" under Calculus and "famous physicists" under General Physics, could enhance the forum's efficiency. Better categorization may lead to quicker responses from knowledgeable individuals, increasing the overall value of Physics Forums. However, concerns arise about the potential lack of experts in certain categories, which could result in those forums being overlooked. This could hinder casual users from finding and answering posts, limiting community engagement. Improved organization is suggested as a means to foster more effective interactions and support among users.
moonman239
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
Like it would be nice to have a "logic, set theory, probability and statistics" category under the Calculus category. And, for example, a "famous physicists" under General Physics. If these homework problems were better categorized, people on this forum may expect quicker answers. And, they might even get answers from someone who is very knowledgeable in that particular category. In turn, that would increase the value of Physics Forums.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with moonman, it seems to me like a good idea
 
What if we don't have experts for several forums. The those forums will actually be ignored and won't have the chance that someone casually finds a post they can help which is what we have now
 

Thread 'Thank you to mentors, advisors and members'

I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
View full post »

Thread 'Thank you physics forums, 20 years later'

About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
View full post »

Similar threads

Media Gallery Survey Results
Replies
3
Views
2K
Praise My feedback, one month and half experience in PF so far
Replies
1
Views
3K
Mass in motivic quantum gravity
Replies
2
Views
4K
Complaint What exactly counts as "homework"?
Replies
16
Views
3K
Studying Should I first study the math or math and physics at the same time?
Replies
9
Views
4K
PF Needs A Personal Theory Forum Like We Need A Computer Virus
Replies
2
Views
5K
Why does biology deal with why questions?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Too many different forums/categories?
Replies
14
Views
4K
B Prereqs for Posting in Special & General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
Studying Chemistry or physics - which one is more suitable for self-studying?
Replies
14
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top