Why not formulate QM in terms of |ψ| squared?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tosh5457
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm Terms
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the formulation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) in terms of the wave function |ψ| squared, specifically addressing its implications for probability distributions of observables. Participants highlight that while |ψ| squared provides the probability distribution for position, it does not encompass other observables like momentum. The conversation emphasizes the utility of density matrices, represented as ρ = ψψ*, in quantum statistical mechanics, which allows for the calculation of expectations for various observables. The complexity of quantum phenomena, such as interference patterns in the double-slit experiment, necessitates the use of complex wave functions rather than solely relying on |ψ| squared.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics fundamentals, including wave functions and probability distributions.
  • Familiarity with density matrices and their role in quantum statistical mechanics.
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms and their application in transitioning between position and momentum space.
  • Basic grasp of quantum observables and expectation values.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of density matrices in quantum statistical mechanics.
  • Study the implications of the double-slit experiment on wave function interpretation.
  • Explore the mathematical framework of Fourier transforms in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the significance of complex numbers in solving the Schrödinger equation.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists interested in quantum statistical mechanics, and anyone exploring the foundational aspects of wave functions and their implications in quantum theory.

  • #31
DrDu said:
You are obviously right, here. Nevertheless my question remains: can we quantize charge density, viewed as a field, directly?

Together with charge density, you need st least the associated charge current operaots, which complement the density to a conservation law. Quantizing this is called current algebra. There have been varous attempts and there is significant literature, but apart from the 1+1D case (where current algebra essentially turns into Kac-Moody algebra) no real breakthrough.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K