Why people float inside free falling airplane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The phenomenon of passengers floating inside a free-falling airplane, often referred to as "weightlessness," occurs because both the airplane and its occupants experience the same acceleration due to gravity, resulting in a lack of normal force acting on the passengers. This discussion highlights that initial conditions, such as velocity and air resistance, can affect the relative motion between the passenger and the aircraft. The concept is illustrated through analogies, such as the behavior of a compressed spring when gravity is removed. Additionally, the importance of precise maneuvers by pilots, especially in "vomit comet" flights, is emphasized to maintain safety and control during these weightless experiences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational acceleration and its effects on objects.
  • Familiarity with the concept of normal force in physics.
  • Knowledge of basic aerodynamics and the role of air resistance.
  • Awareness of flight dynamics, particularly in zero-gravity environments.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of free fall and gravitational acceleration in physics.
  • Explore the mechanics of weightlessness in parabolic flight, commonly known as "vomit comet" flights.
  • Study the effects of air resistance on falling objects and how it differs between solid bodies and fluids.
  • Investigate the design and operation of G meters used in aviation to measure gravitational forces during flight.
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, pilots, and anyone interested in the dynamics of free fall and weightlessness in aviation contexts will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
hackhard said:
can freefall be made to continue forever in park rides
Only simulated by reducing gravity briefly. Most of rollercoaster rides are flipping, rocking, twisting, etc. of drawn out redirected use of gravity for propulsion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
hackhard said:
will it be possible to create 0g condition on Earth (lasting forever)
a "smaller" giant wheel whose axis is rotated by another "larger" giant wheel.
by varying angular velocity of the two such that vertical projection of resultant acceleration of the seat is always 1g down
Set up a giant free fall elevator.

Free-fall calculator

A 500m elevator with a contained falling capsule would give you a mere 10s of zero-G, not including the deceleration.
You'd need another 90m to declerate at 2(+1)gs in 3.5 seconds.

If you wanted 30s of free-fall, the elevator would have to fall about 4.4km and you'd be doing over 1000km/h.
You'd need to endure 3gs for an additional 10s to decelerate to 0 over 1.4km.

No that would suck.
 
  • #33
hackhard said:
can freefall be made to continue forever in park rides
Would NASA waste money on jet fuel, if that was possible?
 
  • #34
hackhard said:
can freefall be made to continue forever in park rides
Actually there is another way... imagine you were launched into a hollow cavity in the center of a large solid body out in space in microgravity. You could oscillate through the center for quite some time. Oh, wow, that's the piece I've looking for, for something different entirely! :-P
 
  • #35
jerromyjon said:
Actually there is another way... imagine you were launched into a hollow cavity in the center of a large solid body out in space in microgravity. You could oscillate through the center for quite some time. Oh, wow, that's the piece I've looking for, for something different entirely!
:-p
If you were in orbit then you would certainly be in microgravity, yes.

But you'd need 20 million 'good for one ride' coupons. And the lineup wait time would out Disneyworld to shame.
 
  • #37
hackhard said:
suppose a train travels along equator at 15,600 mph in direction of rotation of Earth gforce on man inside train is 0.
Going into low orbit is simpler.
 
  • #38
A.T. said:
Going into low orbit is simpler.
It actually seems to be the same thing by definition...
Meaning simply that hackhard's train would need no rails aside from the part where it's picking up its speed initially. After that, it is technically in (very) low orbit.
[edit: in practice a way to remove atmospheric drag would be required, which still means probably a vacuum guide tunnel and the maglev equivalent of rails.]
[edit 2: which is probably more complicated than going into a not-so-low low orbit, which finally makes me appreciate the point you were probably making :p]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OCR

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
16K
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
36K
Replies
10
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
12K