Why photomasks are laser etched but ICs arent

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaydnul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laser
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the fabrication processes of integrated circuits (ICs) and the use of photomasks versus laser etching. Participants explore the reasons behind the preference for photomasks in mass production and the limitations of laser lithography in creating ICs, particularly in terms of speed, cost, and feature size capabilities.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the process of using lasers to dissolve photo resist on photomasks and questions why silicon wafers aren't directly laser etched.
  • Another participant clarifies that laser lithographers are indeed used for ICs, but primarily for prototyping and one-off designs, emphasizing the speed advantage of using masks for mass production.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of laser lithography, noting that it is only effective for larger feature sizes and that e-beam lithography is necessary for smaller features.
  • A participant challenges the assertion that most engineering problems stem from photolithography, suggesting that economic factors heavily influence the choice of fabrication methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the extent to which photolithography contributes to engineering challenges in IC production. There is agreement that laser lithography has limitations and is primarily used for specific applications, but the discussion does not reach a consensus on the overall impact of these methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention economic considerations and the feasibility of different lithography techniques, indicating that the choice of method is influenced by both technical and financial factors. Limitations regarding feature size capabilities of laser lithography are also noted.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those involved in semiconductor manufacturing, photolithography techniques, and the economic aspects of IC production processes.

jaydnul
Messages
558
Reaction score
15
When an IC photomask is being fabricated, a laser carefully dissolves specific portions of the photo resist to develop the precise pattern. But when we make ICs, we use a photomask to place over the silicon and shine coherent light over it at once.

Since most of the engineering problems arise from this photolithographic process using a photomask, why do we not just laser etch the silicon wafers themselves? Would it take too long?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
We DO use laser lithographers for making ICs; but only for prototyping and one-offs (they are becoming quite common in university labs).
However. using a mask is just much faster if you want to make many copies of something.

Also, lasers are only useful for fairly crude lithography (hundreds of nm); you can't use it to make masks for chips with small feature sizes; these are made using e-beam lithography. Hence, laser lithographers are often used to defined conctacts etc whereas you still need e-beam lithography for the actual device.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff, davenn and berkeman
Jd0g33 said:
Since most of the engineering problems arise from this photolithographic process using a photomask, why do we not just laser etch the silicon wafers themselves? Would it take too long?

I wouldn't say "most" of the engineering problems are due to photolithography, although it is a very challenging area of wafer production. f95toli is correct that any kind of direct writing of features on a wafer would be much, much, much more expensive than mass producing with a mask and photolithography. Like many things in the IC business, it is an economic decision as much as a feasibility decision.
 
f95toli said:
We DO use laser lithographers for making ICs; but only for prototyping and one-offs (they are becoming quite common in university labs).
However. using a mask is just much faster if you want to make many copies of something.

Also, lasers are only useful for fairly crude lithography (hundreds of nm); you can't use it to make masks for chips with small feature sizes; these are made using e-beam lithography. Hence, laser lithographers are often used to defined conctacts etc whereas you still need e-beam lithography for the actual device.

thanks mate :smile:

learn something new every day

Dave
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
870
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
50K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K