Why Does Quantum Mechanics Require Complex Numbers?

In summary, the use of complex numbers in quantum mechanics is not simply a mathematical artifact, as seen in the Aharonov-Bohm effect. While some denotations may appear more cumbersome, rational numbers do not provide as accurate a description of reality. The question of why complex numbers are necessary in describing the nature of quantum theory remains unanswered in physics.
  • #1
MichPod
228
45
Is the fact that QM uses complex numbers should be considered as a math artefact (as it is the case when complex numbers are used for alternate current circuit analysis), or, alternatively, it has some deep and important relation to the nature (or at least to the nature of the quantum theory)? If the later is true, could you please clarify or bring some links discussing the topic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Complex numbers are needed in order to correctly describe the interference of probabilities. However, the complex phase of the wave function is not merely a mathematical artifact, as is shown by the Aharonov-Bohm effect.
 
  • #4
Whatever can be described by one complex number can be described, as well, by two real numbers. Some denotations may look more cumbersome in such a real notation, that's all.
 
  • #5
Denis said:
Whatever can be described by one complex number can be described, as well, by two real numbers. Some denotations may look more cumbersome in such a real notation, that's all.

Well, a rational number may be described as a pair of integer numbers as well, but we believe (most of us) that the rational numbers give probably more adequate description of the reality than such a pair.
And... even if we pass to two real numbers instead of one complex number, we still will emulate the complex arithmetic with them. The question is - why? Is the nature in its underneath somehow "complex"?
 
  • #6
MichPod said:
The question is - why? Is the nature in its underneath is somehow "complex"?
Physics doesn't answer "why" questions.

I suggest you read the link I gave, and other threads on PF on the subject (look for "Similar Discussions" below).

Thread closed.
 

1. Why do we need to use complex numbers in quantum mechanics?

The use of complex numbers in quantum mechanics is necessary because they provide a mathematical framework that accurately describes the behavior of quantum particles. In classical mechanics, real numbers are sufficient to represent physical quantities such as position and momentum. However, in quantum mechanics, the behavior of particles is described by wave functions, which require complex numbers to fully capture their properties.

2. Can't we use real numbers instead of complex numbers in quantum mechanics?

No, using only real numbers in quantum mechanics would lead to incorrect predictions and inconsistencies with experimental observations. The use of complex numbers allows for the representation of wave properties, such as interference and superposition, which are essential in describing the behavior of quantum particles.

3. How do complex numbers relate to the physical world in quantum mechanics?

Complex numbers are not directly observable in the physical world, but they are used to represent and calculate the probabilities of different outcomes in quantum measurements. In this way, they provide a mathematical framework for making accurate predictions about the behavior of quantum particles.

4. Are complex numbers only used in quantum mechanics?

No, complex numbers are used in various fields of science and engineering, such as electrical engineering, signal processing, and fluid dynamics. In quantum mechanics, they are specifically used to represent the wave nature of particles and their interactions.

5. Are there any physical interpretations of complex numbers in quantum mechanics?

The physical interpretation of complex numbers is a topic of ongoing debate and research in quantum mechanics. Some theories suggest that the real part of a complex number represents the physical state of a particle, while the imaginary part represents its momentum. However, these interpretations are still being explored and may not be universally accepted.

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
988
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top