Why smooth spherical waves with attenuation are only possible in 3-D

Click For Summary
Attenuation and delay in spherical waves describe how wave amplitude decreases and the time lag in wave propagation, respectively. The attenuation function α(r) indicates a decrease in amplitude as the wave radiates outward, while the delay function β(r) accounts for the time it takes for the wave to reach a specific radius r. The discussion highlights that solutions to the governing equations exist only in one-dimensional and three-dimensional spaces, as indicated by the derived ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The analysis shows that for n=1 or n=3, the attenuation function can be expressed in specific forms, while for other dimensions, solutions do not exist. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing wave behavior in various physical contexts.
docnet
Messages
796
Reaction score
488
Homework Statement
please see below
Relevant Equations
$$\partial_t^2u(t,r)=\partial^2_ru(t,r)+\frac{n-1}{r}\partial_ru(t,r)$$
Hi all, My question is about the attenuation and delay terms in part (1). what are attenuation and delay terms describing in physical phenomenon? thank you. What do "attenuation" and "delay" mean in terms of real-life physical phenomena?
Screen Shot 2021-03-29 at 12.02.43 PM.png
Screen Shot 2021-03-29 at 12.02.48 PM.png


Consider the wave equation for spherical waves in ##n##-dimensions given by
$$\partial_t^2u(t,r)=\partial^2_ru(t,r)+\frac{n-1}{r}\partial_ru(t,r)$$
for an unknown function ##u:(0,\infty)\times(0,\infty)\rightarrow \mathbb{R}##

(1) Consider twice continuously differentiable functions ##\alpha:(0,\infty)\rightarrow (0,\infty)## (the attenuation) and ##\beta:(0,\infty)\mathbb{R}## (the delay) and ##f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}## and make the ansatz
$$u(t,r)=\alpha(r)f(t-\beta(r))$$
(2) We insert this ansatz into the spherical wave equation
$$\partial_t^2\Big[\alpha(r)f(t-\beta(r))\Big]-\partial_r^2\Big[\alpha(r)f(t-\beta(r))\Big]-\frac{n-1}{r}\partial_r\Big[\alpha(r)f(t-\beta(r))\Big]$$
We compute the first term
$$\partial_t^2\Big[\alpha(r)f(t-\beta(r))\Big]\Rightarrow \boxed{\alpha(r)\partial_t^2f(t-\beta(r))}$$
The first derivative of the second term $$-\partial_r\Big[\alpha(r)f(t-\beta(r))\Big] =-\partial_r\alpha(r)f(t-\beta(r))+\alpha(r)\partial_r\beta(r)\partial_rf(t-\beta(r))$$
The derivative of the first term of the first derivative
$$-\partial_r^2\alpha(r)f(t-\beta(r))+\partial_r\alpha(r)\partial_r\beta(r)\partial_rf(t-\beta(r))$$
The derivative of the second term of the first derivative
$$\Big[\partial_r\alpha(r)\partial_r\beta(r)+\alpha(r)\partial^2_r\beta(r)\Big]\partial_rf(t-\beta(r))-\alpha(r)[\partial_r\beta(r)]^2\partial_r^2f(t-\beta(r))$$
That gives the second derivative of the second term $$\Rightarrow \boxed{-\partial_r^2\alpha(r)f(t-\beta(r))+\partial_r\alpha(r)\partial_r\beta(r)\partial_rf(t-\beta(r))}$$
$$\boxed{+\Big[\partial_r\alpha(r)\partial_r\beta(r)+\alpha(r)\partial^2_r\beta(r)\Big]\partial_rf(t-\beta(r))-\alpha(r)[\partial_r\beta(r)]^2\partial_r^2f(t-\beta(r))}$$
The third term:
$$-\frac{n-1}{r}\partial_r\Big[\alpha(r)f(t-\beta(r))\Big]\Rightarrow \boxed{-\frac{n-1}{r}\Big[\partial_r\alpha(r)f(t-\beta(r))-\alpha(r)\partial_r\beta(r)\partial_rf(t-\beta(r))\Big]}$$
We collect the coefficients of the ##f(t-\beta(r))## terms $$\partial_r^2\alpha(r)+\frac{n-1}{r}\partial_r\alpha(r)$$
and the coefficients of the ##\partial_rf(t-\beta(r))## terms
$$\partial_r\alpha(r)\partial_r\beta(r)\alpha(r)+\Big[\partial_r\alpha(r)\partial_r\beta(r)+\alpha(r)\partial^2_r\beta(r)\Big]+\frac{n-1}{r}\alpha(r)\partial_r\beta(r)$$
and the coefficients of the ##\partial_r^2f(t-\beta(r))## terms
$$\alpha(r)[\partial_r\beta(r)]^2-\alpha(r)$$
To make the brackets banish to zero, we set the three collections of terms equal to zero. Setting each collection of terms equal to zero gives the following system of ODEs
$$\boxed{\begin{cases}
\partial_r^2\alpha(r)+\frac{n-1}{r}\partial_r\alpha(r) =0 \\-2\partial_r\alpha(r)+\frac{n-1}{r}\alpha(r) =0\\
[\partial_r\beta(r)]^2=1
\end{cases}}$$
(4) The ODE that involves ##α##only is $$\partial_r^2\alpha(r)+\frac{n-1}{r}\partial_r\alpha(r) =0$$
Case: ##n=1##
$$\partial_r^2\alpha(r) =0$$
The roots of the characteristic polynomial ##\lambda^2=0## is just ##0##. The solution is a polynomial of the form
$$\Rightarrow \boxed{\alpha(r)=cr+d} \quad \text{where }\quad c,d\in\mathbb{R}$$
setting ##n=2## gives a second order euler homegenuous ODE.
$$\partial_r^2\alpha(r)+\frac{1}{r}\partial_r\alpha(r) =0$$
The equation has a solution of the form ##r^x##. plugging ##r^x## into the ODE gives the general solution
$$\boxed{\alpha(r)=cln(r)+d}$$
For the case ##n\geq 3## the ODE is
$$\partial_r^2\alpha(r)+\frac{2}{r}\partial_r\alpha(r) =0$$
By similar methods to the case ##n=2##,
$$\boxed{\alpha(r)=\frac{c}{t}+d}$$
(5) The ODE for ##β(r)## is
$$[\partial_r\beta(r)]^2=1\Rightarrow \boxed{\partial_r\beta(r)=\pm 1}$$
(6) The following system of ODEs in ##\alpha(r)##
$$\begin{cases}
\partial_r^2\alpha(r)+\frac{n-1}{r}\partial_r\alpha(r)=0\\
-2\partial_r\alpha(r)+\frac{n-1}{r}\alpha(r) =0\end{cases}$$ shows that there are no solutions, unless ##n=1## or ##n=3##. We assume the solutions is of form $$\alpha(r)=cr^a$$ for some constants ##c,a\in\mathbb{R}##.
Plugging in the solution to the system of ODEs gives
$$\begin{cases}
a(a-1)+(n-1)c=0 \\ -2a+(n-1)=0
\end{cases}$$
whose solution exists for ##a## only if ##n=1## or ##n=3##.

(7) When we plug in ##n=1##, we get ##a=0## which means ##\alpha{r}=c## for some ##c\in\mathbb{R}##.edited: grammar :headbang:
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2021-03-29 at 12.02.48 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2021-03-29 at 12.02.48 PM.png
    24.6 KB · Views: 163
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The attenuation is the way the amplitude diminishes as the wave radiates out.
It is shown as a factor α(r), presumably monotonically decreasing.
The delay is the time lag between generation of a part of the wave and its reaching radius r. So again, it is a function of r, presumably monotonically increasing this time, with β(0)=0. It is subtracted from t in the expression for u(r,t).

If we have a bit of wave amplitude A emitted at time 0 (u(0,0)=A) and reaching radius r at time t = β(r) then its amplitude there and then will be u(r,t)=α(r)u(0, t-β(r))=α(r)u(0, 0)=Aα(r).
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...