Why the particle that was discovered has to be higgs

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rajeshmarndi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higgs Particle
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
rajeshmarndi
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
why the particle that was believed to be found has to be higgs boson and not just any other fundamental particle that make up preivously thought to be fundamental particles i.e quarks or leptons.

Or it was just only one particles that was missing in the standard model i.e higgs boson.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, it isn't necessarily *the* higgs, but it is likely to be *a* higgs - its a spin 0 boson, but it could be one of the 5 proposed higgs from SUSY. However, as it is spin 0, it cannot be a fermion (ie quarks or leptons, which have spin 1/2), and there are no other spin 0 bosons. The spin can be determined from the decay products. That's what I understand by it, anyway!
 
It can still be spin 2.