Why the square-root of the metric

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stevendaryl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the inclusion of the factor of \(\sqrt{-g}\) in the Lagrangian density for a free scalar particle in curved spacetime. Participants explore the implications of this factor in terms of tensor densities, invariance under coordinate transformations, and the integration of the Lagrangian density to obtain the action.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the Lagrangian is a tensor density, which necessitates the inclusion of \(\sqrt{-g}\) to map a volume to a Lorentz scalar.
  • Another participant explains that the factor of \(\sqrt{-g}\) is required for the integral of the Lagrangian density to remain invariant under changes of coordinate charts.
  • A further contribution states that \(\sqrt{-g}\) corresponds to the determinant of the Jacobian matrix used when transforming from Cartesian coordinates to other coordinate systems, emphasizing the need for this factor to maintain invariance in the volume element.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity of the \(\sqrt{-g}\) factor for invariance in the context of curved spacetime, though they present slightly different perspectives on its role and implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the integration of the Lagrangian density and the transformation of coordinates, but do not delve into specific mathematical derivations or assumptions that may underlie their claims.

stevendaryl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
2,955
In a paper about field theory in curved spacetime, an author says that the Lagrangian density for a free scalar particle is

[itex]L = \sqrt{-g} ((\nabla_\mu \Phi)(\nabla^\mu \Phi) - m^2 \Phi^2)[/itex]

Is there a simple explanation for why this is scaled by [itex]\sqrt{-g}[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The simple explanation is the Lagrangian is a tensor density. You want to map a volume to a number (a Lorentz scalar), but representing the volume requires the factor of sqrt(g).

http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/genrel/ch04/ch04.html (Ben Crowell's online book) talks a little about tensor densities in an informal way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because the Lagrangian density is integrated over spacetime to obtain the action, and without the factor of [itex]\sqrt{-g}[/itex], the integral isn't invariant under a change of coordinate charts. [Edit: This is another way of saying what pervect said.]
 
Because [itex]\sqrt{-g}=det(J)[/itex], where J is the Jacobian matrix transforming from Cartesian coordinates to the coordinates being used in the particular problem.

The volume element in a set of arbitrary coordinates is given by dV=det(J)dx1dx2...dxn. For example, in Cartesian coordinates in 3D space dV=dxdydz. The determinant of the Jacobian transforming to spherical coordinates is r2sinθ, so the volume element in spherical coordinates is dV=r2sinθdrdϕdθ.

You need the factor in front of dnx in order to keep things invariant under a coordinate transformation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K