Why the square-root of the metric

  • #1
stevendaryl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
8,408
2,595
In a paper about field theory in curved spacetime, an author says that the Lagrangian density for a free scalar particle is

[itex]L = \sqrt{-g} ((\nabla_\mu \Phi)(\nabla^\mu \Phi) - m^2 \Phi^2)[/itex]

Is there a simple explanation for why this is scaled by [itex]\sqrt{-g}[/itex]?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
9,900
1,081
The simple explanation is the Lagrangian is a tensor density. You want to map a volume to a number (a Lorentz scalar), but representing the volume requires the factor of sqrt(g).

http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/genrel/ch04/ch04.html [Broken] (Ben Crowell's online book) talks a little about tensor densities in an informal way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2019 Award
31,656
10,389
Because the Lagrangian density is integrated over spacetime to obtain the action, and without the factor of [itex]\sqrt{-g}[/itex], the integral isn't invariant under a change of coordinate charts. [Edit: This is another way of saying what pervect said.]
 
  • #4
260
1
Because [itex]\sqrt{-g}=det(J)[/itex], where J is the Jacobian matrix transforming from Cartesian coordinates to the coordinates being used in the particular problem.

The volume element in a set of arbitrary coordinates is given by dV=det(J)dx1dx2...dxn. For example, in Cartesian coordinates in 3D space dV=dxdydz. The determinant of the Jacobian transforming to spherical coordinates is r2sinθ, so the volume element in spherical coordinates is dV=r2sinθdrdϕdθ.

You need the factor in front of dnx in order to keep things invariant under a coordinate transformation.
 

Related Threads on Why the square-root of the metric

Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
672
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
540
Replies
9
Views
947
Replies
5
Views
3K
Top