A Why the triangle inequality is greater than the 2 max{f(x),g(x)}

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a proof from Sheldon Axler's book on measure theory, specifically regarding the properties of the space L^p(μ). It examines the triangle inequality and how it leads to the conclusion that the norm of the sum of two functions is bounded by a function of their individual norms. The key point is that if one function dominates the other in absolute value, the sum can be simplified to show that it adheres to the inequality involving the maximum of the two functions. Understanding these inequalities is crucial for proving that L^p(μ) is a vector space with standard operations. This foundational concept is essential for further exploration in measure theory.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
TL;DR Summary
I am working on proving the L^p of measureable space (X,S,u) is a vector space. I am lost on why the the triangle intequalty is greater than the 2 max{f(x),g(x)} for a fix x in X.
I am reading Sheldon's Axler Book on Measure theory. He is proving that ##L^p(\mu)## is a Vector space over ##\mathbb{R}.## He claims that if ##\|f+g\|_{p}^p\leq 2^p(\|f\|_{p}^p+\|g\|_{p}^{p})## and nonzero homogenity holds true, then ##L^p{\mu}## is true with the standard addition and scalar multiplication. He starts with the following assumption:

Suppose that ##f,g\in L^p(\mu)## are arbitrary. Then if ##x\in X## is an arbitrary fix element of ##X,## then
##\begin{align*} |f(x)+g(x)|^p&\leq_{\text{triangle inequality}} (|f(x)|+|g(x)|)^p\\ &\leq_{\text{why?}} (2\max{|f(x)|,|g(x)|})^p\\ &\leq2^p(|f(x)|^p+|g(x)|^p)\end{align*}##

If you can explain whys in this proof then I will be able to understand the proof.

Thanks,

Carter Barker
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Because if, e.g., |f|>=|g|, then |f|+|g|<=|f|+|f|=2|f|
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
3
Replies
114
Views
11K
2
Replies
61
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top