Why vacuum tubes can not be made small

  • Thread starter Thread starter planety_vuki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vacuum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Vacuum tubes cannot be miniaturized to millimeter, micrometer, or nanometer sizes due to their inherent design limitations, particularly the size of the glass enclosure and higher power consumption compared to transistors. Current research is exploring nanoscale vacuum channel transistors, which function similarly to traditional vacuum tubes but are not yet practical for widespread use. Despite their limitations, vacuum tubes remain relevant in high-power applications, such as radio transmission and microwave ovens, where they outperform solid-state devices. The discussion highlights the ongoing interest in vacuum tube technology and its potential applications in modern electronics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vacuum tube technology and its operating principles
  • Familiarity with transistor technology, specifically Field Effect Transistors (FETs)
  • Knowledge of power consumption metrics in electronic devices
  • Awareness of current research trends in nanoscale electronics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research nanoscale vacuum channel transistors and their potential applications
  • Explore the differences between vacuum tubes and transistors in electronic circuits
  • Investigate high-power vacuum tube applications, such as klystrons and magnetrons
  • Read about advancements in thermionic emission technology and its future prospects
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, researchers in nanoscale technology, and anyone interested in the comparative analysis of vacuum tubes and transistors in modern electronic applications.

planety_vuki
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Why vacuum tubes can not be made small sized ? I'm talking about millimeter to micrometer or maybe even nanometer size ranges ? Or can they be ?

This way electronic devices, for example computers, could be made they way they were made in the past but much smaller.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Even if you COULD make VTs really small, the glass enclosure for one would be HUGE compared to a single transistor on a wafer, AND the power consumption would be enormously higher. What could possibly be the point of reverting from an excellent technology to a vastly inferior one?
 
phinds said:
Even if you COULD make VTs really small, the glass enclosure for one would be HUGE compared to a single transistor on a wafer, AND the power consumption would be enormously higher. What could possibly be the point of reverting from an excellent technology to a vastly inferior one?

I think they would work without glass envelope for every each of them, istead the whole chip would be inside evacuated glass. Second, there is really no strong reason, I just like vacuum tubes, their operating principle is simpler than transistors. Also I simply just wander if they can be made at small sizes. I mean, would it work ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FETs are not a million miles from a vacuum tube, aamof. They work on the effect of the volts on the gate, like the grid of a valve.
At the other end of the power range, there is still no substitute for the several hundred kW Radio Transmitting Valve or the 50kW UHF Klystron, both, very much vacuum tubes. There's no better way of powering your microwave oven than the Magnetron, still.
Thermionic is far from dead, chaps. It's horses for courses.
 
Sophie hit the nail right on the head. As soon as I saw the title for this thread I thought of FETs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K