Why volume is conserved but not the surface area?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of volume and the increase in surface area when a water droplet of radius 10-2 m is divided into 1000 smaller droplets. The surface tension of water is 0.075 N/m. The conservation of volume is explained through the relationship between mass and density, where mass remains constant and density is assumed constant. In contrast, surface area increases because the geometry of the droplets changes; smaller droplets have a larger surface area to volume ratio. This phenomenon is illustrated with mathematical relationships and practical examples, such as cutting a loaf of bread.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic fluid mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of surface tension and its effects on droplets
  • Familiarity with geometric relationships of spheres
  • Basic algebra and calculus for volume and surface area calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of volume and surface area for different shapes
  • Learn about the effects of surface tension on droplet formation and stability
  • Investigate the applications of fluid dynamics in real-world scenarios, such as oil spills
  • Study the principles of mass conservation in fluid mechanics, including the continuity equation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and environmental science, particularly those interested in fluid dynamics and surface phenomena.

  • #31
Adesh said:
Is it that density experiment (means density would not change) or something else?
No, it's what @jbriggs444 describes in Post #28.

Lavoisier did similar experiments in which he established conservation of mass.

Density is a concept derived from the concepts of mass and volume.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Adesh
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
With all this talk of dividing up water, I thought I might add this very satisfying video...

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
  • #33
etotheipi said:
Thanks, I'll take a look! I hadn't come across the Lagrangian specification of a field before, but it seems fairly intuitive (quite similar conceptually to the ##\vec{\xi} = \vec{x}(t_0)##, ##\vec{x} = \chi(\vec{\xi}, t)## of continuum mechanics).
I'd recommend to start with the Lagrangian description of the electromagnetic field, which is simpler than fluid dynamics.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Adesh and etotheipi
  • #34
The conservation of mass is of course valid only in Newtonian physics. In relativistic physics the invariant mass (in the 21st century we only talk about invariant masses in relativistic physics anyway) of composite objects need not be conserved. E.g., in the fusion reactions of nuclei in the Sun the binding energy of the nucleons is not negligible compared to the masses and thus the masses of the nuclei are smaller than the sum of the masses of the protons and neutrons forming the nucleus. What's conserved here is energy. In relativistic physics there's no additional conservation law for mass.

Within Newtonian physics mass is conserved, and in continuum mechanics it is described by the continuity equation for the mass, i.e.,
$$\partial_t \rho + \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{j}=0, \quad \vec{j}=\rho \vec{v}.$$
This holds for both compressible as well as incompressible fluids (e.g., a gas which is easily compressed vs. liquids like water which are very hard to compress).

The question whether a fluid can be considered incompressible (which is always an approximation valid for not too large pressure) is quantifiable by the compressibility

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressibility

Particularly for water:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Properties_of_water#Compressibility
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Adesh and etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K