Will a car on ice have its maximum speed reduced?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of low coefficients of friction on a car's maximum speed, particularly when the car is on an icy or extremely slippery surface and stuck in first gear. Participants explore the relationship between static friction, rolling resistance, and air drag in determining the car's velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that while a car on ice may reach maximum speed in first gear, the low static friction limits the force it can apply, potentially reducing its speed due to rolling resistance.
  • Another participant emphasizes that air drag is a major limiting factor for a car's velocity, and questions how tire rolling resistance interacts with static friction on ice.
  • A participant shares personal experience from ice racing, noting that the coefficient of friction on ice is low but may not significantly affect top speed compared to pavement.
  • One participant seeks to conceptualize how a very low coefficient of friction (e.g., 0.0001) could limit a car's speed, arguing that rolling resistance would become equal to the force the car can apply, thus restricting acceleration.
  • Another participant questions the coefficient of rolling resistance being used in the context of low static friction and explains how different gears affect torque and speed, highlighting the trade-off between acceleration and maximum speed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of low coefficients of friction on maximum speed, with some focusing on the role of air drag and others on rolling resistance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conceptual implications of low static friction on speed.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the situation, noting that factors such as air drag, rolling resistance, and gear dynamics contribute to the overall behavior of the car, but do not reach a consensus on the primary limiting factors.

Omnirizon
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
suppose we have a car on ice stuck in first gear.

intuitively, I thought it should still be able attain maximum speed (in first gear) in a straight line, but it would take longer because it couldn't apply as much force before the force it applies is greater than the static friction between the car's tire and the icy surface.

however, after trying some calcs (I may be doing them wrong): it seems that the icy surface would limit the car's speed because rolling resistance will soon bring the small amount of force the car can apply to accelerate to a net total of zero.

that is, when the car attempts to apply force to accelerate, the current rolling resistance at a given velocity will reduce that force to zero. because force is limited by low static friction (the ice) it is unable to obtain the same velocity it could on something with greater static friction (like pavement).

is this correct? if not what am I doing wrong?



this is all assuming the car is stuck in first gear (I can't quite wrap my head around how higher gears would work, but it seems that they essentially 'store' inertia in another form different from the inertia in the car's tires).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The major force that limits a car's velocity is the air-drag force, and maintaining a specific velocity requires a balancing torque (force) at the drive wheels. The maximum torque at the drive wheels is limited by the coefficient of static friction (as you pointed out) of the wheels on the ice. (If the car had all-wheel drive, would the tire rolling resistance limit the maximum velocity?)
Bob S
 
This might be useful.
http://www.casc.on.ca/iceRacing.php"
You can Google 'ice racing' for a lot more hits.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Considering that with reasonable tires, the C of F on ice is about .3 and the acceleration rate of the average family car in top gear is rarely above that, the top speed of a car is going to be quite close to what it can attain on pavement. Not recommended as the stopping distance will be considerable. As a former ice-racer I can attest to that.

The salt flats can sometimes offer less traction than ice yet the cars running there certainly manage some pretty stout speeds.
 
Ok. Thanks for all your responses, they have been helpful, but are not quite getting at what I was asking.

I'm not interested in ice racing, nor the real coefficient of friction on ice. I also know that rolling resistance is very small for a car compared to air drag. I'm attempting to get at a conceptual point; namely that low C of F can actually limit the top speed of a car (which doesn't seem very intuitive to me, at first).

so let's suppose the car is stuck in first gear on something really slippery, even more slippery than ice. Also, the car is in a vacuum. This surface has a C of F of 0.0001.

is it the case that because the C of F limits the amount of force the car's wheels can apply to the surface, the rolling resistance (which will much sooner become equal to the force the car's wheels can apply) will act to limit the car's speed to a much lower speed than if the car was on dry pavement?

Please try to keep your responses in a simple conceptual space. Ice racing and salt flats have little to do with this question because those situations involve an array of other factors that render the conceptual point here much less important (namely, that they have gears to carry inertia and lessen the amount of torque actually applied at the wheels, and foils to press the car into the ground).
 
And what are you using for Crr (coefficient of rolling resistance) since you are using such a small number for Csf (coefficient of static friction)?

The essence is that if the static friction is higher for the drive wheels than the rolling resistance of the non-driven wheels, in the absence of any other forces (drag from air for instance) the vehicle will be able to continually accelerate until something limits that process, such as the max rpm of the engine or a cliff.

Different gears change the amount of torque available to accelerate the vehicle by trading torque for speed. You've probably noticed that your car goes faster but accelerates at a lower rate in higher gears. You can't have both at the same time!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K