Will a Rolling Ball on a Level Surface Ever Stop?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a rolling ball on a level surface, particularly in relation to forces such as gravity and friction. Participants are examining whether a ball will eventually stop rolling based on the principles of physics and the assumptions of idealized models.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of a zero acceleration scenario on a level surface, questioning the role of friction in the stopping of a rolling ball. There are discussions about the differences between rolling and sliding motion, and the effects of energy loss due to friction and drag.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with various interpretations being explored regarding the effects of friction and the limitations of idealized models. Some participants suggest that friction will cause the ball to stop, while others emphasize the assumptions made in textbook scenarios.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of an "idealized model" that does not account for friction or energy loss, which is a central point of contention in the discussion. Participants are also considering the physical realities of rolling motion, such as the contact area between the ball and the surface.

Euclid
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
The textbook solution for a pipe rolling down an incline is [tex]a = \frac{1}{2} g \sin \theta[/tex]. Putting in theta = 0 gives a = 0. Does this imply that a ball rolling along a level surface will never stop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means that the object will not accelerate on a level plane if gravity is the only force.
 
Gravity is not the only force on an incline. Friction acts as well. And friction acts on a level plane too. So a rolling ball should come to a stop due to friction...
 
the textbook solution was for an "idealized model" with zero friction.
The MODEL has zero friction. Your fault if you try to apply this model
to situations where friction is NOT ignorable.

You're right, the model has a (hard) surface's Force as well as gravity's Force. And it suggests that the pipe rolling on a level floor will not slow down. Don't try this a home ; you'll soon over-reach this model when the pipe hits the kitchen table.
 
You said that this is the formula for a pipe rolling. If it was sliding, then friction would be a problem, but as it is rolling, friction shouldn't be the problem should it?
If I'm right, then the error would be due to some of the kinetic energy of motion being converted to heat, due to the particles of the pipe hitting against the particles in the surface when it is rolling, and drag.
So the textbook model was from an idealised model with friction, but with no energy loss as heat or drag.
 
There is also the fact that, it is not exactly one point that touches the ground during rolling motion as we assume in the ideal case. There will be an area which is in contact with the ground. Due to this the Normal force does not pass exactly through the center and hence there's a restoring torque which slows down the pipe.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K