Will the 2 dimensional sphere rotate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicS FAN
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotate Sphere
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 1K views
PhysicS FAN
Messages
26
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A 200kg sphere is in touch with two walls. The horizontal wall has no coefficient of friction and the vertical has μ=0.25. If we apply a force F=400N will the sphere rotate?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]
What I can't understand is, if there is balance in the y and x-axis beacuse if so the problem is easily solved. I proved it theoritically but I can not find a mathematical solution. Please help me.
 

Attachments

  • WIN_20190222_14_03_35_Pro (2).jpg
    WIN_20190222_14_03_35_Pro (2).jpg
    13.4 KB · Views: 415
Physics news on Phys.org
BvU said:
I am missing a force (*) in your drawing. Can you post your theoretical proof ?

[edit] (*) unless the B has a specific meaning
Sorry my fault, B is representing a point not a force. The theoretical proof is that in order for the sphere to rotate, the torque of F should be bigger than the torque of T. Its clear that both T and F are in the same distance from the center K which means we can now compare F and T as forces. The biggest value of T is always less than F since T=μ*N=0.25*N and N the reaction of the verticall wall is not big enough to cause balance.
 
PhysicS FAN said:
torque of T
Good you mention it. I can now even distinguish a T in the picture.

I agree with your reasoning and wonder why you have difficulty with the force balances: if you write then in full (i.e. ##\ \vec a = \displaystyle \sum \vec F\ \ ##) there should be no problem. Clearly there is no acceleration to the right, so the reaction force from the wall to the left is equal to F. That gives you the magnitude of T as you used it.

[edit] the next line is based on a wrong assumption:
Note that even when ##\mu = 1 \;##, nothing happens since the sum of vertical forces won't exceed 0.

[edit] the wrong assumption being: nothing happens with ##\mu = 0.25 \;##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicS FAN
BvU said:
Good you mention it. I can now even distinguish a T in the picture.

I agree with your reasoning and wonder why you have difficulty with the force balances: if you write then in full (i.e. ##\ \vec a = \displaystyle \sum \vec F\ \ ##) there should be no problem. Clearly there is no acceleration to the right, so the reaction force from the wall to the left is equal to F. That gives you the magnitude of T as you used it.

Note that even when ##\mu = 1 \;##, nothing happens since the sum of vertical forces won't exceed 0.
Yeah