Wireless Comm: Establishing Distant Tracking Between 2 Objects

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around establishing wireless communication between two devices for the purpose of tracking the distance between them, with a focus on a maximum range of 20-30 meters. Participants explore various methods and technologies for achieving this, including considerations for portability, cost, and ease of construction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to track distance wirelessly and execute actions based on distance thresholds.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on budget, ease of construction, and size constraints.
  • Some participants suggest alternative methods such as using a spring-loaded string or laser rangefinding instead of wireless communication.
  • A participant proposes using a low power transmitter and receiver setup to measure signal strength as a means to determine distance, but acknowledges the limitations of this method.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliability of using signal strength alone for distance measurement, with suggestions for triangulation as a potentially more accurate method.
  • One participant describes a pulse transmission method involving timing to measure distance, but notes potential variability in accuracy due to signal delays.
  • There is a suggestion that GPS could be a viable alternative for tracking the roaming unit's position.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for tracking distance wirelessly. Multiple competing views and methods are proposed, with some participants expressing skepticism about the reliability of certain approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding the environment, such as open space for communication, and the need for the devices to be portable. There are also unresolved questions about the accuracy and feasibility of the proposed methods.

  • #31
vk6kro said:
I have to wonder if we are going overboard a bit.

We are trying to locate a roving module which will be in plain sight all the time by spending hundreds (possibly thousands) of dollars on electronics.
Unless it is on Mars there must be a more realistic way of doing it.

What about marking a 30 M radius circle (with a piece of string if you like) and get some clear flexible plastic tubing and lay it out around the circumference of the circle?
Use tent pegs to hold it in position.

It would take 189 metres of plastic tubing to do this.
Then you put a plug in one end of the tube and a pressure sensor at the other end and ring a bell if something runs over the pipe.

What is the actual application?

http://www.linxtechnologies.com/

The have some cheap TX/RX modules that can output the RSSI. Can this be compared to a reference voltage and if its lower, then it is outside the allowable range and sets off an alert? Because information is being exchanged, will I need a TX and RX on both devices, or are there devices that can do both (transmit and receive)?

The application is for me to learn something about wireless communication. Eventually I want to be able to have a robot follow me or another robot using simple RF communication.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Those modules have frequency ranges from 260 - 470 MHz with wavelengths from about 1.15 to 0.64 meters. At these frequencies the signal may bounce off the ground and arrive either in phase or out of phase with the direct signal, thus the RSSI would indicate a higher or lower reading than would be expected from distance alone. In addition a signal at these frequencies can be affected by the proximity of a human body.

In contrast, by using frequencies in the LF band (below 490 kHz), the wavelengths, instead of being about 1 meter, would be closer to 1 km. At 30 meters you would see no multipath nor will the proximity of a human body have much effect on the signal strength. In addition 30 meters will be within the near field region in which the signal level falls off more rapidly than the inverse square law giving you more repeatable results than at higher frequencies.

It should be fairly simple to build transmitters and receivers in the LF band. The received signal strength can be compared to an adjustable reference voltage that you would adjust by going 30 meters away and setting it so that it just barely turns on. If you don't put a small amount of hysteresis in the comparator, it may "chatter" a little right at 30 meters. You also need to keep good conductors (metals) away from the ferrite antennas as they will tend to detune them.

Lastly these frequencies are covered in part 15 of the FCC regulations which means you don't need a license to operate as long as you don't use excessive power.
 
  • #33
Are LF transmitters and receivers readily available or as you said is this something I will have to build myself? Size is sort of an issue (smaller the better).
 
  • #34
EEstudentNAU said:
Are LF transmitters and receivers readily available or as you said is this something I will have to build myself? Size is sort of an issue (smaller the better).

I know of none that are commercially available so you can have the fun of building it yourself. For the transmitter you'll want an oscillator, perhaps tunable, and a buffer amplifier driving a tuned ferrite rod.

The receiver will take the signal from the ferrite rod and amplify it, rectify it and compare it to your set point. The easy way is to use an IF integrated circuit with an RSSI output such as the MC3372. If you need more sensitivity you can always add a low noise, high frequency opamp at the input.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
skeptic2 said:
The receiver will take the signal from the ferrite rod and amplify it, rectify it and compare it to your set point. The easy way is to use an IF integrated circuit with an RSSI output such as the MC3372. If you need more sensitivity you can always add a low noise, high frequency opamp at the input.

And what else needs to be part of the ferrite rod antenna and first gain stage circuit...?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K