Witten's paper.Strings+Twitor space

  • Thread starter Thread starter meteor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
meteor
Messages
937
Reaction score
0
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0403199


Parity Invariance For Strings In Twistor Space
Authors: Edward Witten
Comments: 18 pp

Topological string theory with twistor space as the target makes visible some otherwise difficult to see properties of perturbative Yang-Mills theory. But left-right symmetry, which is obvious in the standard formalism, is highly unclear from this point of view. Here we prove that tree diagrams computed from connected $D$-instanton configurations are parity-symmetric. The main point in the proof also works for loop diagrams




Is this the last paper of Witten about strings before he renounces to string theory?

oops sorry for the title. I meant "twistor" :redface:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
meteor said:
...
oops sorry for the title. I meant "twistor"

twitor-----pronounced twitter-----sounds fine to me (twitter means excitement: "in a twitter" and "all a-twitter", and also is a noise made by
large numbers of small birds)

Two PF posters, Andy Neitzke and Lubos Motl, are to be congratulated
on the fact that Witten cited papers coauthored by each.


[9] A. Neitzke and C. Vafa, “N = 2 Strings And The Twistorial Calabi-Yau,” hep-th/0402128.
...
...

[15] N. Berkovits and L. Motl, “Cubic Twistorial String Field Theory,” hep-th/0403187.
 


No, this paper is not Witten's last paper about strings before he renounces string theory. In fact, Witten continues to contribute to the field of string theory and has published numerous papers on the subject since this one was published in 2004. This paper specifically explores the relationship between strings and twistor space, and how this perspective can shed light on certain properties of perturbative Yang-Mills theory. It also makes a significant contribution by proving that tree diagrams computed from connected $D$-instanton configurations are parity-symmetric. Overall, this paper is an important piece in Witten's ongoing research on string theory and its connections to other areas of physics.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top