Work against an electric field due to a point charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from a physics textbook concerning the work done against an electric field due to a point charge. The scenario involves a positive charge fixed at a point and a negative charge moving in a circular path, with the task of deriving an expression for the work needed to change the radius of this motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integral for work against the electric field and question the role of gravitational forces in the context of electric forces. There is also confusion regarding the inclusion of mass in the work calculation and the relationship between work and electric potential.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct formulation of the work equation, emphasizing the need to consider the charge being moved and the electric field. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with participants reflecting on their understanding and calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the original poster is grappling with the definitions and relationships between work, force, and electric potential, which may not be fully resolved in the discussion.

mhen333
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need help seeing if I did this right...

This is from Fundamentals of Physics, 8th edition, volume 2. By Jearl Walker.
Chapter 24, problem 88.

A particle of positive charge Q is fixed at point P. A second particle of mass m and negative charge -q moves at a constant speed in a circle of radius [tex]r_{1}[/tex] centered at P. Derive an expression for the work W that must be done by an external agent on the second particle to increase the radius of the circle of motion to [tex]r_{2}[/tex].

Homework Equations


[tex] <br /> W_{\vec{E}} = -\int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{r}<br /> [/tex]
[tex] \vec{E} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{r}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I'm thinking. The work against the electric field is just the integral above. Since the particle stays on an equipotential surface, I should only have to worry about work outward, right?

Here's what I have:

[tex] <br /> W_{total} = W_{\vec{E}} = \left(\frac{1}{r_{2}} - \frac{1}{r_{1}}\right) \left(\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\right)<br /> [/tex]

Please help point out if I've done something wrong!-Mike
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your idea is correct, but your first equation is wrong. Usually gravity is ignored because the gravitational force is small compared to the electric force.
 
I think I figured out where I went wrong in my equation.

So I'm confused, where does the mass 'm' come in?
 
In brief, Work = Force times distance. So your equation for work should be

[tex]W_{\vec{E}} = -\int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} q \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{r}[/tex]

Where the force is qE, q being the charge that's moved, and E is the field due to the charge Q.
 
Also, I should mention that you are correct. Work is done only when the charged is moved along a radial path.
 
Besides the approach that I mentioned in my previous post, you can also use the fact that Work = qV where q is the charge that's being moved, and V is the change in electric potential.

What you calculated in your work below, was the change in electric potential, not the work. All you have to do is change the "W" to "V" and multiply through by the charge q.

You were on the right track. Just forgot the definition, W = qV. So now you have two ways to look at it.

mhen333 said:



Homework Equations


[tex] <br /> W_{\vec{E}} = -\int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{r}<br /> [/tex]
[tex] \vec{E} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{r}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I'm thinking. The work against the electric field is just the integral above. Since the particle stays on an equipotential surface, I should only have to worry about work outward, right?

Here's what I have:

[tex] <br /> W_{total} = W_{\vec{E}} = \left(\frac{1}{r_{2}} - \frac{1}{r_{1}}\right) \left(\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\right)<br /> [/tex]

Please help point out if I've done something wrong!


-Mike
 
Thank you so much!

I've been nearly pulling my hair out over this.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K