Work against an electric field due to a point charge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done against an electric field due to a point charge, specifically in the context of a problem from "Fundamentals of Physics, 8th edition" by Jearl Walker. The correct expression for work is derived as W = -∫(r₁ to r₂) qE·dr, where E = (1/4πε₀)(Q/r²) and q is the charge being moved. Participants clarified that the work done is related to the change in electric potential, emphasizing the formula W = qV for calculating work in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and forces, specifically Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with integral calculus for evaluating work done
  • Knowledge of electric potential and its relationship to work
  • Basic concepts of charge and mass in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric field equations, particularly for point charges
  • Learn about the relationship between electric potential and work done in electrostatics
  • Explore integral calculus applications in physics, focusing on work and energy
  • Investigate the concept of equipotential surfaces and their implications in electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, educators teaching electric field concepts, and anyone seeking to understand the principles of work done against electric fields in electrostatic scenarios.

mhen333
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need help seeing if I did this right...

This is from Fundamentals of Physics, 8th edition, volume 2. By Jearl Walker.
Chapter 24, problem 88.

A particle of positive charge Q is fixed at point P. A second particle of mass m and negative charge -q moves at a constant speed in a circle of radius r_{1} centered at P. Derive an expression for the work W that must be done by an external agent on the second particle to increase the radius of the circle of motion to r_{2}.

Homework Equations


<br /> <br /> W_{\vec{E}} = -\int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{r}<br /> <br />
<br /> \vec{E} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{r}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I'm thinking. The work against the electric field is just the integral above. Since the particle stays on an equipotential surface, I should only have to worry about work outward, right?

Here's what I have:

<br /> <br /> W_{total} = W_{\vec{E}} = \left(\frac{1}{r_{2}} - \frac{1}{r_{1}}\right) \left(\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\right)<br /> <br />

Please help point out if I've done something wrong!-Mike
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your idea is correct, but your first equation is wrong. Usually gravity is ignored because the gravitational force is small compared to the electric force.
 
I think I figured out where I went wrong in my equation.

So I'm confused, where does the mass 'm' come in?
 
In brief, Work = Force times distance. So your equation for work should be

W_{\vec{E}} = -\int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} q \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{r}

Where the force is qE, q being the charge that's moved, and E is the field due to the charge Q.
 
Also, I should mention that you are correct. Work is done only when the charged is moved along a radial path.
 
Besides the approach that I mentioned in my previous post, you can also use the fact that Work = qV where q is the charge that's being moved, and V is the change in electric potential.

What you calculated in your work below, was the change in electric potential, not the work. All you have to do is change the "W" to "V" and multiply through by the charge q.

You were on the right track. Just forgot the definition, W = qV. So now you have two ways to look at it.

mhen333 said:



Homework Equations


<br /> <br /> W_{\vec{E}} = -\int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}} \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{r}<br /> <br />
<br /> \vec{E} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{r}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I'm thinking. The work against the electric field is just the integral above. Since the particle stays on an equipotential surface, I should only have to worry about work outward, right?

Here's what I have:

<br /> <br /> W_{total} = W_{\vec{E}} = \left(\frac{1}{r_{2}} - \frac{1}{r_{1}}\right) \left(\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\right)<br /> <br />

Please help point out if I've done something wrong!


-Mike
 
Thank you so much!

I've been nearly pulling my hair out over this.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
997
Replies
64
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
969
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K