Work and energy -- Change in KE due to a force F acting on a mass

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Newton's second law, represented by the equation F = ma, and the work-energy principle, expressed as W = ∫ F·s, in analyzing the change in kinetic energy (KE) due to a force acting on a mass. The participant @Max2020 presents a force equation F = 3i + 6t²j - tk, which is deemed irrelevant as it is part of the problem statement rather than the solution. The conversation highlights the importance of integrating the force equation correctly and the necessity of including the initial velocity v₀ = j + 2k for a complete analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F = ma)
  • Familiarity with the work-energy principle (W = ∫ F·s)
  • Basic knowledge of vector calculus for integration
  • Concept of initial velocity in kinematic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Newton's second law in various contexts
  • Learn about the work-energy theorem and its implications in physics problems
  • Explore vector calculus techniques for integrating vector functions
  • Investigate the role of initial conditions in solving motion problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to forces and energy changes in physical systems.

Max2020
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
a force of F = 3i + (6t ^ 2) j - tk acts on a particle of mass 2 kg, where F is given in newtons and t in seconds. if the initial velocity of the particle is Vo = j + 2k, in meters per second. () What is the work done by force F during the interval 0 <= t <= 2? () Using the definition of kinetic energy (K = mv ^ 2/2), find the kinetic energy variation ∆K of the particle in the same range.
Relevant Equations
F= 3i +(6t^2) j -tk
20210426_150244.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @Max2020 ,
:welcome: ##\qquad !##​

Did you notice your picture is rotated by 90 degrees ? It hurts to look at it !

Your $$\vec F= 3\,\hat\imath +6t^2 \,\hat\jmath -t\,\hat k $$ is not a relevant equation: it is part of the problem statement. Fortunately I do find a relevant equation (##\vec F = m\vec a##) in your picture if I almost break my neck.

The other relevant equation is ##W = \int \vec F\cdot\vec s##, also to be found in your work.

So you try to integrate ##\vec F = m\vec a\ ## twice. But I miss the given ##v_0 = \hat \jmath + 2\,\hat k\ ## there ?

Or do you have some other question that I somehow missed ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
Hello @Max2020 ,
:welcome: ##\qquad !##​

Did you notice your picture is rotated by 90 degrees ? It hurts to look at it !

Your $$\vec F= 3\,\hat\imath +6t^2 \,\hat\jmath -t\,\hat k $$ is not a relevant equation: it is part of the problem statement. Fortunately I do find a relevant equation (##\vec F = m\vec a##) in your picture if I almost break my neck.

The other relevant equation is ##W = \int \vec F\cdot\vec s##, also to be found in your work.

So you try to integrate ##\vec F = m\vec a\ ## twice. But I miss the given ##v_0 = \hat \jmath + 2\,\hat k\ ## there ?

Or do you have some other question that I somehow missed ?

##\ ##
I'm sorry for posting the photo like this. I still can't see a way to resolve this issue.
 
Max2020 said:
I'm sorry for posting the photo like this. I still can't see a way to resolve this issue.
1619481818607.png


:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
851
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K