Work calculation for lifting a Tetrahedron-shaped object from the water

  • #31
@Frabjous, I tried sending a PM (private message) to you (and @NODARman). But the system wouldn't let me send it to you. I know the problem requires a method using integration, but If you are interested in how to do it without any explicit integration, let me know.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: NODARman
on Phys.org
  • #32
Steve4Physics said:
@Frabjous, I tried sending a PM (private message) to you (and @NODARman). But the system wouldn't let me send it to you. I know the problem requires a method using integration, but If you are interested in how to do it without any explicit integration, let me know.
If you are talking about not having to integrate 1-(h/h₀)³, I’d be interested.
 
  • #33
Frabjous said:
If you are talking about not having to integrate 1-(h/h₀)³, I’d be interested.
I'll attempt to send it again.
 
  • #34
Maybe I misread the above posts, but IMO the buoyancy (from Archimedes principle) needs to be ## \int \rho g \,dV=\int \rho g A \, dh ##. and note: ## \rho ## is the density of the water, so it along with ## g ## can be in front of the integral.). post 26 is trying to do an integral of ## \int V \, dh ## , and that is incorrect.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
Charles Link said:
Maybe I misread the above posts, but IMO the buoyancy (from Archimedes principle) needs to be ## \int \rho g \,dV=\int \rho g A \, dh ##. and note: ## \rho ## is the density of the water, so it along with ## g ## can be in front of the integral.). post 26 is trying to do an integral of ## \int V \, dh ## , and that is incorrect.
It’s a work integral of a fully submerged volume. This is an incomplete thread because the discussion moved to a private conversation. I believe the OP is satisfied.
 
  • #36
Frabjous said:
It’s a work integral of a fully submerged volume. This is an incomplete thread because the discussion moved to a private conversation. I believe the OP is satisfied.
The OP looks to me to still be doing an incorrect computation of the buoyant force.
 
  • #37
Charles Link said:
The OP looks to me to still be doing an incorrect computation of the buoyant force.
He’s calculating the work done by gravity and buoyancy of a fully submerged constant volume that is lifted height L-h.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #38
Frabjous said:
He’s calculating the work done by gravity and buoyancy of a fully submerged constant volume that is lifted height L-h.
Thank you=I just re-read the title of the post=the work to lift the object. I would expect to see ## W=\int F \cdot ds ##, but my mistake. :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frabjous

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K