Work calculation for lifting a Tetrahedron-shaped object from the water

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done in lifting a tetrahedron-shaped object from water using integrals. Key parameters include the tetrahedron side length "a," water depth "L," and the density of iron "rho (Fe)." The work is divided into three regions: fully submerged, partially submerged, and above the water surface, with specific equations provided for each region. The total work is expressed as a combination of gravitational and buoyancy forces integrated over the respective heights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, particularly in physics applications.
  • Familiarity with buoyancy principles and Archimedes' principle.
  • Knowledge of the properties of tetrahedrons, including volume and center of gravity calculations.
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation and presentation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Archimedes' principle in fluid mechanics.
  • Learn how to derive the volume and center of gravity for tetrahedrons.
  • Explore advanced integral calculus techniques for physics problems.
  • Practice using LaTeX for formatting mathematical equations and expressions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and mathematics who are involved in fluid mechanics, particularly those working on problems related to buoyancy and work calculations in lifting submerged objects.

  • #31
@Frabjous, I tried sending a PM (private message) to you (and @NODARman). But the system wouldn't let me send it to you. I know the problem requires a method using integration, but If you are interested in how to do it without any explicit integration, let me know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Steve4Physics said:
@Frabjous, I tried sending a PM (private message) to you (and @NODARman). But the system wouldn't let me send it to you. I know the problem requires a method using integration, but If you are interested in how to do it without any explicit integration, let me know.
If you are talking about not having to integrate 1-(h/h₀)³, I’d be interested.
 
  • #33
Frabjous said:
If you are talking about not having to integrate 1-(h/h₀)³, I’d be interested.
I'll attempt to send it again.
 
  • #34
Maybe I misread the above posts, but IMO the buoyancy (from Archimedes principle) needs to be ## \int \rho g \,dV=\int \rho g A \, dh ##. and note: ## \rho ## is the density of the water, so it along with ## g ## can be in front of the integral.). post 26 is trying to do an integral of ## \int V \, dh ## , and that is incorrect.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
Charles Link said:
Maybe I misread the above posts, but IMO the buoyancy (from Archimedes principle) needs to be ## \int \rho g \,dV=\int \rho g A \, dh ##. and note: ## \rho ## is the density of the water, so it along with ## g ## can be in front of the integral.). post 26 is trying to do an integral of ## \int V \, dh ## , and that is incorrect.
It’s a work integral of a fully submerged volume. This is an incomplete thread because the discussion moved to a private conversation. I believe the OP is satisfied.
 
  • #36
Frabjous said:
It’s a work integral of a fully submerged volume. This is an incomplete thread because the discussion moved to a private conversation. I believe the OP is satisfied.
The OP looks to me to still be doing an incorrect computation of the buoyant force.
 
  • #37
Charles Link said:
The OP looks to me to still be doing an incorrect computation of the buoyant force.
He’s calculating the work done by gravity and buoyancy of a fully submerged constant volume that is lifted height L-h.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #38
Frabjous said:
He’s calculating the work done by gravity and buoyancy of a fully submerged constant volume that is lifted height L-h.
Thank you=I just re-read the title of the post=the work to lift the object. I would expect to see ## W=\int F \cdot ds ##, but my mistake. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K