Work done by a expanding and contracting wire over a Carnot cycle

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Uriel
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Basically I have the following problem. Given the equation of state [itex]\sigma = \frac{b}{T}\frac{L - L_0}{L_0}[/itex] where b and [itex]L_0[/itex] are positive constants, calculate the work done over a Carnot cycle by a wire with this equation of state.

Homework Equations

I already have the work done over the isoterm curves. But when I try to calculate the work on the adiabatic processes I just get stuck over and over again.

The Attempt at a Solution



I use the first law of thermodynamics

[itex]du = \delta Q + \delta W[/itex]

also we know that the work for this system is the following

[itex]\delta W = - \tau dL[/itex]

and in a book of basic thermodynamics I have found that

[itex]dT = -\frac{T}{c_\tau}\left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial T} \right)_\tau d\tau[/itex]

Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Uriel. Welcome to PF!

Uriel said:
I already have the work done over the isoterm curves. But when I try to calculate the work on the adiabatic processes I just get stuck over and over again.
Can you give more details about what you've tried?

Uriel said:
also we know that the work for this system is the following

[itex]\delta W = - \tau dL[/itex]
What is ##\tau##?
 
DrClaude said:
Hi Uriel. Welcome to PF!


Can you give more details about what you've tried?


What is ##\tau##?

[itex]\tau[/itex] is the [itex]\sigma[/itex] in the equation of state, it's linear tension, I change the name of the variable because [itex]\sigma[/itex] might be confused by strains and that's not the case, I'm sorry for that.

Using the first law on the isotherm process we got that the internal energy doesn't change, therefore

[itex]d u = 0[/itex]

and using this [itex]\delta W = -\delta Q[/itex]

now we know that the work is computed with the integral [itex]\delta W = - \int \tau dL[/itex]
so it's really simple to calculate, for the case on the two isotherm processes.

My problem arises when I try to calculate the work performed over the adiabatic cycles. I have two options, integrate over the path of the adiabatic curve from one state to the other, or I need to know the internal energy of the system and using that plug in the temperature of each state and calculate the difference.
That is the awful part; given the equation [itex]dT = - \frac{T}{c_\tau} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial T} \right)_\tau d \tau[/itex]

I need to know L, but this is easy, [itex]L = \frac{L_0 T}{b}\tau + L_0[/itex],

next I calculate the partial derivative of L with respect to T leaving [itex]\tau[/itex] constant.

So [itex]\left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial T} \right)_\tau = \frac{L_0 \tau}{b}[/itex]

then [itex]dT = - \frac{T}{c_\tau} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial T} \right)_\tau d \tau = - \frac{T}{c_\tau} \frac{L_0 \tau}{b} d \tau[/itex].

Reordering the terms in the differential equation we get

[itex]\frac{dT}{T} = - \frac{L_0}{c_\tau b} \tau d \tau[/itex]

solving the differential equation we get this

[itex]ln \left( \frac{T_f}{T_i} \right) = - \frac{L_0}{c_\tau b} \left( \frac{\tau_f^2 - \tau_i^2}{2} \right)[/itex]

And that's all I got, I don't have the slightest idea what to do next.
 
In which book did you see that problem?
 
Miroslava said:
In which book did you see that problem?

I'm not sure it was a book problem. I think the professor just made it up, but she was very fond of the book of Callen.