Work done by electrostatic force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the work done by electrostatic force when a small, positively charged sphere is released from rest and moves away from a larger, positively charged sphere. The initial conclusion drawn by the participant was that the electrostatic force does positive work, increasing the kinetic energy of the small sphere. However, the provided answer indicated negative work, which led to confusion. Ultimately, it was clarified that the electrostatic force indeed does positive work, and the discrepancy in the answer is likely a typographical error.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatic forces and charges
  • Knowledge of kinetic and potential energy concepts
  • Familiarity with the work-energy theorem
  • Basic grasp of electric fields and their directionality
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Explore the relationship between electric potential energy and kinetic energy
  • Learn about electric fields and their effects on charged particles
  • Investigate common misconceptions in electrostatics and their resolutions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone seeking to clarify concepts related to work done by forces in electric fields.

x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


A small, positively charged sphere is released from rest and moves directly away from a larger, positively charged sphere. During this process, the electrostatic force:

a) does positive work and increases the kinetic energy of the small sphere
b) does negative work and increases the kinetic energy of the small sphere

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

( + ) ----> (+)

So the electrostatic force is pushing the smaller charged force away. It looses potential energy and converts it into kinetic energy. Since W = (delta) (Kinetic energy) and kinetic energy increases, Ek > 0

Movement is also in the direction of the electric field (cos0) = 1 therefore it should be positive (as far as I know)

Work should be positive, the answer should be A)

However, the answer is B). Why?

It doesn't mathematically make sense to me. I've proven that W = change in kinetic energy.

However, when I conceptually think about it it makes sense that work is negative- because it's the same thing as a mass falling from a height- negative work is done on it.

Is this physics? Will it be full of exceptions and mathematical fallacies?

It seems like physics is turning more and more into a computer script

if case 1: do this algorithm
if case 2: do that algorithm

Is that it? Will I just have to just memorize these exceptions as I go along in physics, or is there another way of looking at it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
x86 said:

Homework Statement


A small, positively charged sphere is released from rest and moves directly away from a larger, positively charged sphere. During this process, the electrostatic force:

a) does positive work and increases the kinetic energy of the small sphere
b) does negative work and increases the kinetic energy of the small sphere

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

( + ) ----> (+)

So the electrostatic force is pushing the smaller charged force away. It looses potential energy and converts it into kinetic energy. Since W = (delta) (Kinetic energy) and kinetic energy increases, Ek > 0

Movement is also in the direction of the electric field (cos0) = 1 therefore it should be positive (as far as I know)

Work should be positive, the answer should be A)

However, the answer is B). Why?

It doesn't mathematically make sense to me. I've proven that W = change in kinetic energy.

However, when I conceptually think about it it makes sense that work is negative- because it's the same thing as a mass falling from a height- negative work is done on it.

Is this physics? Will it be full of exceptions and mathematical fallacies?

It seems like physics is turning more and more into a computer script

if case 1: do this algorithm
if case 2: do that algorithm

Is that it? Will I just have to just memorize these exceptions as I go along in physics, or is there another way of looking at it?

No, I think you have the right way of looking at it. The force does positive work on the kinetic energy of the system. I think it's more likely to be a typo in the answer than any need to reevaluate your basic concepts.
 
Dick said:
No, I think you have the right way of looking at it. The force does positive work on the kinetic energy of the system. I think it's more likely to be a typo in the answer than any need to reevaluate your basic concepts.

Thank you for clearing my confusion
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K