Work done by friction on a hockey puck

  • Thread starter Thread starter I_Try_Math
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The work done by friction on a hockey puck, as calculated using the coefficient of kinetic friction function u(x) = 0.1 + 0.05x, results in a value of -0.501 J, according to Wolfram Alpha's calculations. The discrepancy with the answer key, which states -0.9 J, has led to confusion among students. The mass of the hockey puck is confirmed to be 0.17 kg, and the standard weight of a hockey puck is between 156 and 170 grams. This discussion highlights the importance of verifying calculations against reliable sources.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic friction and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with integral calculus for calculating work done
  • Knowledge of basic physics concepts related to mass and weight
  • Ability to use computational tools like Wolfram Alpha for verification
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of kinetic friction and its impact on motion
  • Learn how to perform integrals in physics, specifically for calculating work
  • Research the properties and specifications of standard hockey pucks
  • Explore the use of computational tools for solving physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the application of calculus in real-world scenarios, particularly in sports physics.

I_Try_Math
Messages
119
Reaction score
25
Homework Statement
A hockey puck of mass 0.17 kg is shot across a rough floor with the roughness different at different places, which can be described by a position-dependent coefficient of kinetic friction. For a puck moving along the x-axis, the coefficient of kinetic friction is the following function of x, where x is in m: u(x) = 0.1 + 0.05x. Find the work done by the kinetic frictional force on the hockey puck when it has moved from x = 0 to x = 2
Relevant Equations
[math]W = \int_0^2 F(x) \, dx[/math]
The answer key claims the answer is -0.9 J.

By my math it should be -0.501 J, is that incorrect?
phys-forum-713.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I_Try_Math said:
Homework Statement: A hockey puck of mass 0.17 kg is shot across a rough floor with the roughness different at different places, which can be described by a position-dependent coefficient of kinetic friction. For a puck moving along the x-axis, the coefficient of kinetic friction is the following function of x, where x is in m: u(x) = 0.1 + 0.05x. Find the work done by the kinetic frictional force on the hockey puck when it has moved from x = 0 to x = 2
Relevant Equations: [math]W = \int_0^2 F(x) \, dx[/math]

The answer key claims the answer is -0.9 J.

By my math it should be -0.501 J, is that incorrect?
View attachment 339633
You mean " by Wolfram Alpha's math" its ##-0.501 \rm{J}##. Wolframs math looks correct to me also...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR, Delta2 and I_Try_Math
erobz said:
You mean " by Wolfram Alpha's math" its ##-0.501 \rm{J}##. Wolframs math looks correct to me also...
Thanks, it's frustrating trying to learn when you can't check your work against the answer key.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
haruspex said:
I assume the "0.17kg" was a typo.
0.17x9.8=1.67!?!!

But yeah I got no clue how heavy is a hockey ball, hockey isn't popular here in Greece.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: I_Try_Math and haruspex
Delta2 said:
0.17x9.8=1.67!?!!

But yeah I got no clue how heavy is a hockey ball, hockey isn't popular here in Greece.
I had to look it up. Google "how heavy is a hockey puck".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_puck said:
Ice hockey requires a hard disk of vulcanized rubber. A standard ice hockey puck is black, 1 inch (25 mm) thick, 3 inches (76 mm) in diameter, and weighs between 5.5 and 6 ounces (156 and 170 g);[6] some pucks are heavier or lighter than standard (see below). Pucks are often marked with silkscreened team or league logos on one or both faces.[6] Pucks are frozen before the game to reduce bouncing during play.[6]
1706919186124.png
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K