Work done by friction on a hockey puck

  • Thread starter Thread starter I_Try_Math
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the calculation of work done by friction on a hockey puck, with the answer key stating -0.9 J, while one participant calculates it as -0.501 J using the coefficient of kinetic friction function. There is agreement that the calculation from Wolfram Alpha, which also yields -0.501 J, appears correct. Frustration is expressed over discrepancies between personal calculations and the answer key, highlighting the challenge of verifying work. Additionally, there is a brief exchange about the weight of a hockey puck, clarifying that it typically weighs between 156 and 170 grams. Accurate calculations and understanding of physics principles are essential for resolving such discrepancies.
I_Try_Math
Messages
114
Reaction score
25
Homework Statement
A hockey puck of mass 0.17 kg is shot across a rough floor with the roughness different at different places, which can be described by a position-dependent coefficient of kinetic friction. For a puck moving along the x-axis, the coefficient of kinetic friction is the following function of x, where x is in m: u(x) = 0.1 + 0.05x. Find the work done by the kinetic frictional force on the hockey puck when it has moved from x = 0 to x = 2
Relevant Equations
[math]W = \int_0^2 F(x) \, dx[/math]
The answer key claims the answer is -0.9 J.

By my math it should be -0.501 J, is that incorrect?
phys-forum-713.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I_Try_Math said:
Homework Statement: A hockey puck of mass 0.17 kg is shot across a rough floor with the roughness different at different places, which can be described by a position-dependent coefficient of kinetic friction. For a puck moving along the x-axis, the coefficient of kinetic friction is the following function of x, where x is in m: u(x) = 0.1 + 0.05x. Find the work done by the kinetic frictional force on the hockey puck when it has moved from x = 0 to x = 2
Relevant Equations: [math]W = \int_0^2 F(x) \, dx[/math]

The answer key claims the answer is -0.9 J.

By my math it should be -0.501 J, is that incorrect?
View attachment 339633
You mean " by Wolfram Alpha's math" its ##-0.501 \rm{J}##. Wolframs math looks correct to me also...
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR, Delta2 and I_Try_Math
erobz said:
You mean " by Wolfram Alpha's math" its ##-0.501 \rm{J}##. Wolframs math looks correct to me also...
Thanks, it's frustrating trying to learn when you can't check your work against the answer key.
 
haruspex said:
I assume the "0.17kg" was a typo.
0.17x9.8=1.67!?!!

But yeah I got no clue how heavy is a hockey ball, hockey isn't popular here in Greece.
 
  • Like
Likes I_Try_Math and haruspex
Delta2 said:
0.17x9.8=1.67!?!!

But yeah I got no clue how heavy is a hockey ball, hockey isn't popular here in Greece.
I had to look it up. Google "how heavy is a hockey puck".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_puck said:
Ice hockey requires a hard disk of vulcanized rubber. A standard ice hockey puck is black, 1 inch (25 mm) thick, 3 inches (76 mm) in diameter, and weighs between 5.5 and 6 ounces (156 and 170 g);[6] some pucks are heavier or lighter than standard (see below). Pucks are often marked with silkscreened team or league logos on one or both faces.[6] Pucks are frozen before the game to reduce bouncing during play.[6]
1706919186124.png
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top