Work Done by Gas in Carnot Cycle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the work done by gas during the isothermal and adiabatic processes in a Carnot Cycle, exploring the relationship between pressure, volume, and energy transfer in these thermodynamic processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of energy transfer during adiabatic and isothermal expansions, questioning how kinetic energy and internal energy relate to work done by the gas. There are attempts to clarify the differences between adiabatic and isothermal processes, particularly regarding temperature and energy flow.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications about the processes. Some participants express confusion about the implications of energy transfer in isothermal conditions, while others attempt to clarify the concepts of internal energy and work done during expansions.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of consensus on the understanding of energy transfer in isothermal processes compared to adiabatic processes, with some participants questioning the assumptions made about kinetic energy and internal energy during these changes.

Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was thinking about the isothermal and adiabatic expansions in the Carnot Cycle and I was wondering:

In these processes, the gas is doing work. In the adiabatic change, the pressure (force), acts over a distance (expansion) transferring energy (Kinetic Energy) - but this is an adiabatic change, so it's impossible to transfer energy. Is it therefore, the process of the pressure expanding the gas that requires the use of energy - in this case, the Kinetic Energy of the molecules?

In the case of the isothermal change (I haven't studied the Second Law of Thermodynamics, but from the looks of it, it seems it isn't possible for this change to happen, but, anyway, ignoring that now...) heat energy is transferred to the gas. This thermal energy would increase the K.E, therefore, increasing the pressure and allowing for the same thing to happen - pressure acting over a distance (doing work) and this action requires energy, energy, in this case, Kinetic, which is equal to the amount of thermal energy transferred in: for ∆Q = 0 + ∆W

In those cases, the energy transfer would be from internal energy/KE to potential energy of the piston?

Are those correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter G. said:
In these processes, the gas is doing work. In the adiabatic change, the pressure (force), acts over a distance (expansion) transferring energy (Kinetic Energy) - but this is an adiabatic change, so it's impossible to transfer energy. Is it therefore, the process of the pressure expanding the gas that requires the use of energy - in this case, the Kinetic Energy of the molecules?

Yes. If the gas expands, its temperature has to go down to compensate.

In the case of the isothermal change (I haven't studied the Second Law of Thermodynamics, but from the looks of it, it seems it isn't possible for this change to happen, but, anyway, ignoring that now...)

There's nothing that prevents isothermal change from happening. If I compress a gas, it would ordinarily heat up. However, if I put it in a refrigerator and cool it at exactly the same rate as it's heating up, I can keep its temperature constant.

heat energy is transferred to the gas. This thermal energy would increase the K.E, therefore, increasing the pressure and allowing for the same thing to happen

No, there can be no change in kinetic energy. Isothermal means constant temperature, and temperature is directly proportional to kinetic energy, so kinetic energy can't change in an isothermal process.

What happens is that pressure and volume may change, but temperature has to stay constant. For example, if I compress some gas, but do it slowly enough that the gas is always in thermal equilibrium with its surroundings, I get an isothermal process. Conversely, if I try to expand some gas, its temperature would ordinarily decrease. However, if heat transfer between the gas and its surroundings is efficient enough, the gas can always stay in thermal equilibrium.
 
Ah I think I got it:

1. In the isothermal expansion for example, the gas would still, like in the adiabatic, be expanding at the cost of it's internal energy but, at the same time, immediately, energy is flowing in from the surroundings to compensate?

2. During the compressions, I understand the energy transfer. If we imagine ourselves compressing a gas in a piston, we are exerting a force over a distance and transferring chemical energy in our muscles to internal energy in the gas (or is it potential energy to the piston?)

But how does it happen during expansion? The "act" of the pressure acting on the piston over a distance uses up Kinetic Energy? And then the piston gains, say, potential energy?

Thanks once again,
Peter G.
 
Last edited:
Peter G. said:
But how does it happen during expansion? The "act" of the pressure acting on the piston over a distance uses up Kinetic Energy? And then the piston gains, say, potential energy?
During a quasi-static adiabatic expansion, the gas does work on the surroundings in an amount: [itex]W = \int PdV[/itex] where P is the internal pressure of the gas.

If it is not a quasi-static expansion (the external pressure is less than the internal gas pressure by more than an infinitessimal amount), the work done on the surroundings is [itex]W = \int PdV[/itex] where P is the external pressure on the gas (NOT the internal gas pressure).

In both cases, the work is done on the surroundings (e.g. pushing a piston to lift a weight). Since no heat flows into the gas, the energy must come from the internal (kinetic) energy of the gas.

AM
 
Hi,

Since no heat flows into the gas, the energy must come from the internal (kinetic) energy of the gas.

Even in an isothermal process?
 
Peter G. said:
Even in an isothermal process?
?? An isothermal process is not adiabatic.

In an adiabatic process, dQ = 0. So dU = -dW.

In an isothermal process dQ<>0. So dW <> dU ie. dU = dQ-dW

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K