Work Done on an object by 3 Forces (Very Confused)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the calculation of work done on an object by three forces, specifically whether to use the net force or just the x-component of the force. One participant argues that since the object is sliding on a horizontal plane, it can only move in the x-direction, while the other clarifies that the overhead view allows for movement in both x and y directions. The conversation also addresses the conventions of coordinate axes, confirming that unless specified, participants can define their axes as they choose, but must communicate their choices clearly. Ultimately, understanding the orientation of the axes in relation to the problem is crucial for accurate calculations. The clarification provided helps resolve the confusion about the movement and force components involved.
Travis Enigma
Messages
13
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
The figure shows an overhead view of three horizontal forces acting on a cargo canister that was initially stationary but now moves across a frictionless floor. The force magnitudes are F1 = 3.00 N, F2 = 4.00 N, and F3 = 10.0 N, and the indicated angles are θ2 = 50.0˚ and θ3 = 35.0˚. What is the net work done on the canister by the three forces during the first 4.00 m of displacement?
Relevant Equations
W= F*d*cos(theta)
Here's a diagram of the object
IMG_3156.JPG
My Question: My friend and I were solving this problem. We both found Fxnet and Fynet. However to find work I did W= Fnet*d whereas he did W= Fxnet* d. He claims that since it's sliding on the floor it can only go in the x-direction, and it can't go in the y-direction. Which one of us is right?

My 2nd Question: I always thought the following x-axis: left and right, y-axis: forward and backward, z-axis: up and down. Is this right? If so, then how come my friend is telling me it's impossible for it to go in the y-axis because it can't go up since it sliding on a horizontal plane?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe your friend doesn't realize that the figure shows an "overhead" view. So, the x-y plane is the floor. The canister is free to slide in both the x and y directions.
 
  • Like
Likes Travis Enigma and Lnewqban
Travis Enigma said:
My 2nd Question: I always thought the following x-axis: left and right, y-axis: forward and backward, z-axis: up and down. Is this right? If so, then how come my friend is telling me it's impossible for it to go in the y-axis because it can't go up since it sliding on a horizontal plane?
There are no specific rules concerning the directions of the x, y, and z axes. If the axes are not specified in a problem, then you are free to choose the orientation of the axes as you wish. If the axes are given, as in this problem, then you need to make sure you see how the axes are oriented in 3D space. The 3 forces are given to be horizontal. So, the x-y plane is horizontal; i.e., parallel to the floor.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, Travis Enigma and jbriggs444
Travis Enigma said:
Homework Statement:: The figure shows an overhead view...

My Question: My friend and I were solving this problem. We both found Fxnet and Fynet. However to find work I did W= Fnet*d whereas he did W= Fxnet* d. He claims that since it's sliding on the floor it can only go in the x-direction, and it can't go in the y-direction. Which one of us is right?
The first sentence of the problem statement says "The figure shows an overhead view".
My 2nd Question: I always thought the following x-axis: left and right, y-axis: forward and backward, z-axis: up and down. Is this right?
It is purely a matter of convention. If you are working in two dimensions with one of them vertical (for instance, a child carrying a sled up a hill) then one would normally use x for horizontal and y for vertical.

If one is working in two dimensions with both of them horizontal (for instance, a race car on a circular course), one might well use x for east-west and y for north-south.

If one is using three dimensions, you are correct that the usual convention is x for east-west, y for north-south and z for up-down.

That said, unless the problem has already stated them, you are free to define axis directions and coordinate variable names as you please. Just clearly state your choices so that the teacher can understand what you are doing.

More generally...

Often, a good choice of coordinate system can simplify a problem significantly. Changing variable names can be a way to keep track of which coordinate system you are using.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and TSny
Thank you both so much for your help, I understand now!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K